Oh God..seriously.

Advocating an increase in the free loading NGO population explosion, is blind Freddy.

What we really need is a Chinese invasion, and a total revolutionary approach to society.

A Chinese dictatorship keeps all sides happy.
Strong leadership, a social perspective and an anti-Neoliberal economy.

I’m beginning to warm to “Panda Tony” and “What’s Wong”. And for that matter, Chairman Dan.

Australia has a need to Nationalise personal assets and spread the joy by force, among the proletariat.

But sadly for the increasing numbers of the poor, Capitalist have wedged this possibility out of contention, with a new Secular Cargo Cult religion, with its base teaching established on the unshakable ground of greed and self interest.

A five thousand dollar holiday is far superior than charity giving: But wait! what are these scruffy unwashed living in tents on the grounds of what was once my idyllic holiday destination? Homeless losers I’d suggest!

Dan

Given the squealing for reductions in emissions by 2030 and the consequent increase in electricity prices, there won't be any money left to "to double the amount given to charity by 2030".

It is no wonder that donations to charities have dropped, given the stories about the crookedness of many of them and their fatcat CEO's, who have added political activism to their duties.

What people do with the money left to them after Big Government has taken its cut is their business, and no amount of bullying by the likes of this virtue signaller will change that.

Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is the study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science, theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and control of social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems: mathematics. Therefore, mathematics is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.

All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?

In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible and worthy few.

In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name of "silent weapons".

In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the magnates of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and services, is the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and manipulatable.

[Cont.]

In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low-class elements of the society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained, and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age, before they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter. In order to achieve such enormity, the lower-class family unit must be disintegrated by a process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment of government-operated day-care centers for the occupationally orphaned children.

The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort, so that the moat of ignorance isolating the interior class from the superior class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is essential to maintaining some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility for the ruling upper class.

AC

History has proved the failure of any long term benefits towards the lower classes, by revolutionary means coming from the bottom upwards. That’s the conundrum to be solved for any signs a society may be shifting towards an egalitarian centre.

A total collapse of society will ensure a new order emerges, but that order will need a guiding hand in a direction which will be determined by those with the most power to achieve it.

In the case of Nazi Germany, that order was establishing itself in the early 1920’s with a domestic conflict between leftist agitation from Russia, against a Nationalist power group of the home grown disgruntled failed military: A rabble which quickly reorganised itself into a fighting force opposed to the leftist revolutionaries.
It should have been a flourishing for Germany, but alas! Hitler.

All social systems appear to fail on the undeveloped playing field of greed and self interest.

The failed deck of the good old ship called Democracy, is fraught with increasing hazards for the crew.
After a refit in the engine room, with neoliberal philosophy which promoted and accelerated social division, and creating more poverty than wealth, as that wealth migrated with the exponential speed of a train wreck on the mountain side, what next?

It appears to be round and round the mulberry bush, as the choice is returning to the failed Communist leftist, once defeated by Hitler. History only repeats!

Dan

AC

I reread your post for further clarity, but I think I understood it.

You handsomely describe our failed Democracy, and it’s manipulation for the sake of rule and capture of stolen wealth.

There are a small number of key moments in its development, from your description of its failure that need to be signposted.

Multiculturalism:
Multiculturalism is the most divisive of them all. It heralded in a fracture of the Countries traditional culture by offering wedge politics a free hand.

Equality and rainbow flag politics:
A march of Quasi-Democracy. This is an elitists tool created for the explicit purpose of further social fracture, and has magnificently divided society into good guys V bad guys.
This heading encompasses your take on dumbing down the masses through indoctrination of children at a school level.
All of which are pointing to a cause for the number of mass shootings in US schools. Nothing “much” to do with gun controls at all.

Trashing of traditional values of Democracy, promoted by Christianity and its adherence to the principles of social morality and social responsibility, with a direction of an egalitarian centre and focus. An unselfish and inclusive society.

I could add more.

Dan