The word is sex, not gender. Gender is better employed in grammar. There are only two sexes, male and female, and it is hideous that courts have any say in the matter.

I find that the UK judge exhibited a level of bigotry and discrimination in handing down a patently flawed finding. We cannot, must not, follow suit least we open another can of worms!

If a person's mental well being is absolutely dependant on gender reassignment? And proceeded by years of introspection and soul searching!

Then who is he or any judge to find against that? He or they, have no medical expertise, nor equipped by his/their belief systems, because that's what is on display here, I believe, to render such a self-evident, biased and discriminatory judgement!?

Perhaps it needs to be decided, if anyone else has that particular right, by a jury of peers!?

Therefore, if you agree with that premise, then that jury should consist of twelve, gender reassigned, fellow citizens!

These matters are rare and deeply personal and should/needs must, remain that way!
Alan B.

The Tasmanian Government, The Victorian Government and the judges
cannot make decisions like they have.
All three should be removed from their positions and examined by
psychiatrists for sanity.

If such decisions are allowed to stand then no one can be expected to
obey any law enacted by those madmen and madwomen.
As they are of unsound mind they must be removed from positions of power.

If they can justify this, they could bring in any unworkable law.
They could adopt the UN proposal that the speed limit should be 30km/hr.
Imagine this; I might build an addition to my house that contravenes
a state law then could I defend that case by stating that the
lawmakers are insane and cannot perform their duties when they passed
the law on building additions.
Asked to prove my case; They think men can become woman and vice versa.
They might also believe that the number one can be number two.
They might also believe that up and down are the same.
After all they are demonstratively insane.

Hi Holly,
Thanks for your article and info.

"Do we really want to live in a society in which women can be fired from their jobs for denying that a 6 foot 2 inch bearded male is a woman?"

I'm sorry, but you're a little bit late on this, it's already happening.
People are already being fired, it's not a precedent it's an agenda.
- Part of the 2030 agenda and in line with UN Sustainable Development Goals.

"An experienced Christian doctor in the United Kingdom was forced out of his job as a disability benefits assessor for refusing to use transgender pronouns while working for the British government. Now he has lost his lawsuit against the government after refusing, hypothetically, to refer to a six-foot-tall bearded man as madam."

http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/2019/october/christian-doc-loses-job-as-uk-judge-rules-biblical-view-of-male-and-female-violates-human-dignity-nbsp

No-one seems to get it.

They're undermining all collective forces other than their own in their efforts to undermine national soverignty in support of globalism.

Basically they are stealing the ownership of nations away from those nations national citizens and into the hands of global governance beaurecrats.

First they disempowered your men.
- But you didn't see it because you were too busy thinking about women and equality, they used you.
Now they're disempowering you as well.

They're happy to empower you if it disempowers your men.
- But then they will use some minority or disadvantaged group to disempower you too.

They are trying to erase any semblance of real identity.
So we're all fighting with each other but not seeing the bigger picture;
And so no-one can ever be unified to fight back against it.

They play both sides against the middle, and in the chaos, continue shifting the goalposts.
There's no such thing as national democracy in a 2 party system where one platform is an immigrant platform.
What that is, is international democracy being imposed upon nation states.

I think you'd do better to stop looking at the individual issues and to start looking at the bigger picture.

Don't you see the aim is to remove any semblance to any previous identity, most importantly national identity, in order to replace it with a global generic identity where nations don't exist?
- Or at least don't mean anything in terms of the people living there or their culture.
i.e exist in name and place only.

Is it really that difficult to people to get their head around?

All of it must be subverted for the globalist agenda.
It's right there in your UN SDG's
You didn't read the fine print.

And those judges aren't mad, they're doing exactly whats expected of them to forward the agenda, just like all their other judge mates.
Probably owned or compromised.

We 'the normal born-here Aussies' make arguments like:
'Foreigners should assimilate into the country they're coming into.
Existing citizens shouldn't have to assimilate into the country they came from.'

Many people think this is what's happening, and so thats how they relate to it.
But that's not whats happening, is it?
What's actually happening is every western soverign nations citizens are themselves being assimilated into the generic global identity.

This idea of 'assimilation' comes from a past belief that this was OUR country and belonged to US.
- But it's not anymore.

And this is why you won't hear any talk about foreigners assimilating anywhere.
None of any of this is about them assimilating into our culture.
Foreigners assimilating into our culture is the opposite of what they want.
- It's about us assimilating into the new global culture, and us identifying as global citizens instead of national citizens
As global citizens, we're completely removed from being the owners and decision makers of our own country.

With the nation polarised, and the people completely disunified
There's no way we can become unified to fight off these shackels of PC globalism.
And you don't necessarily have to persecute people to dispower them
You just remove their ability to take part in society.
Make them jobless if they don't follow the global narrative.
Censor them on social media, and hound them to death by making global minorities a more powerful voice than national majorities.

Business elites and banksters have now made slaves of all the workers again, you all just can't see it yet.
There's no protesting unless your forwarding THEIR politically correct agendas.
There's no unifying with like minded people, we're all too different now.
There's no civil war or revolution possible to remove tyrannical government because they've stiched that up with the Kigali Principles.

Humans have become slaves all over again.

As far as the UK is concerned the writing was on the wall years ago, but no-one cared or paid attention back then when Tommy Robinson was being unfairly targeted.

'Brave New World' is the problem.
It's an agenda.