The Forum > Article Comments > The energy revolution must be nuclear > Comments
The energy revolution must be nuclear : Comments
By Wade Allison, published 20/6/2019If the world is going to get the energy revolution it requires, it needs realistic energy policies that are scientifically sound and promote a fuel that provides plentiful energy on demand, while doing the least harm to nature. That fuel is nuclear.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
Nuclear energy is and always was the energy source of the future for an energy hungry world. It baggers belief that Australia, with abundant supplies of uranium refuses to acknowledge this inconvenient truth. But nuclear energy will eventually be used in Australia because sooner or later the socialists holding this country back will eventually get back into power, and make such a dog's breakfast of the economy, that they will be swept away in a wave of electoral discontent that intelligent people will be elected into government.
The Greens oppose fossil fuels, hydro electricity, and nuclear energy, which just happens to constitute around 95% of the world's energy output. They are living in fantasyland. Future historians will marvel at how educated ands supposedly intelligent people could be mesmerised into accepting a quasi religious belief system which is inimitable to their own survival.
Labor and the Greens are not much better, both are in thrall to this human induced global warming religion which is looking more shonky year by year, as global temperatures refuse to rise.
Build some more coal fired power stations as an interim measure until we can get our nuclear energy system up and running. We can mine it, reprocess it, and dispose of it safely because of our unique geography of stable rock formations.
Then buy some 688 class nuclear submarines off the yanks instead of these shonky French subs that everybody on planet Earth knows will be a catastrophe, both militarily and financially.