The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Christian liberty: are you serious?? > Comments

Christian liberty: are you serious?? : Comments

By Darren Nelson, published 11/5/2018

Christianity is by-far-and-away the most compatible religious faith or spiritual belief with Liberty.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. 13
  10. All
Applied christian "liberty" 101, or how christian-ISM as a power-and-control-seeking ideology, and its INEVITABLE equally benighted off-spring the materialist "culture" of death came to dominate the entire world

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~spanmod/mural/panel21.html
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~spanmod/mural/panel13.html

Plus check out references to the Wetiko disease or mind virus which was originally described in the book Columbus and Other Cannibals by Jack Forbes.
Also God Is Red by Vine Deloria.

The Wetiko disease/virus is of course still very much alive.
Posted by Daffy Duck, Friday, 11 May 2018 1:42:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
For the umpteenth time, atheism is not a belief.

As an apologist for Christianity the author has failed spectacularly. The faith is one of history's most repressive ideologies.
Posted by mac, Friday, 11 May 2018 2:40:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Christianity is indeed highly compatible with liberty. But Christianity is quite incompatible with Austrian School economics which uses dubious reasoning and blatantly false assumptions to justify policies which serve the rich at the expense of the poor.
Posted by Aidan, Friday, 11 May 2018 3:21:54 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Wow, it would take pages upon pages of posts to debunk all the misconceptions and falsehoods in this article, so I’ll just address the most glaring and fundamental error.

From the article: “This is not the case for the other major religions such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and New Age as well as Atheism and Humanism.”

Atheism is not a worldview and does not warrant a capital ‘A’, as the author incorrectly types it. It is the rejection of religious claims as unsupported by the evidence, or the lack of belief in a god.

Atheism is a response to a single proposition. It says nothing about where one should go from there or what else they should believe - that will depend entirely on the individual.

An all-round terrible article.
Posted by AJ Philips, Friday, 11 May 2018 3:23:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'For the umpteenth time, atheism is not a belief. '

no just totally irrational
Posted by runner, Friday, 11 May 2018 3:41:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
mac,
Are you saying that the belief that no deity is real is not a belief?
Or are you claiming that atheism is not the belief that no deity is real?
If the latter, WTF do you think it is? And what proportion of atheists do you think agree with you?

Christianity is not in any way a repressive ideology. Repression has existed since (and probably before( ancient times, and Christianity hasn't always stopped leaders from being repressive - though many times it has.

_________________________________________________________________________________

runner,
Atheism is not totally irrational. It is a reasonable (though not inevitable) result of making incorrect assumptions. Compare and contrast that with Austrian School economics where both the assumptions and the reasoning are incorrect.
Posted by Aidan, Friday, 11 May 2018 4:05:20 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. 13
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy