Trump must do what he promised the American people he'd deliver for them at home!

As for Israel?

Perhaps you could ask his new best friends to hold him to account on the promises he made to them, be they Saudi Princes or Putin or Sara Nethanyahu? I'm sure they would give you a very warm welcome and lots of helpful advice?

I just don't know what Sara would give you? A cup of tea, maybe?

Can only hope it's not what she gives to the emasculated Israeli PM to keep him under her thumb and requiring her permission to act? Allegedly?
Alan B.

America's permanent deep state has been raising a hullabaloo about Russian involvement with America's political process while not noticing the elephant in the loungeroom - racist Israel.

Even the most wildly fanciful allegations of foreign Russian involvement don't come within a bull's roar of the constant involvement of foreign racist Israel in American politics, with US shill after shill daily confirming allegiance to racist Israel and accepting the Israeli vacuum hose attached to the American financial teat. The FBI might profitably target AIPAC.

Sure a two state solution to Israel would be more just than the current one-state commitment of the USA to the Israeli race supremacists provided each state had equal rights and powers - even though the only truly just solution would be the dismantlement of Israel like that of the Boer Union of South Africa, and democratic Palestianian government throughout Palestine.

#Alan B

Pretty disgusting bottom of the barrel comment showing you have nothing really constructive to offer.

#Emperor Julian

Ah - now here is someone you can always rely on for an inane comment such as the following:
"the only truly just solution would be the dismantlement of Israel like that of the Boer Union of South Africa, and democratic Palestianian government throughout Palestine."
By "democratic Palestinian Government" do you mean:
(i) that practised by Hamas or
(ii) that practised by the PLO
neither of which has held parliamentary elections in their respective fiefdoms since 2006 and whose President Mahmoud Abbas will meet President Trump today enjoying the spotlight whilst in the 12th year of his four year elected term.

Democracy or Shamocracy?

In 1917 it was Zionists colluding with super-power Britain to manipulate the Palestinians into accepting Zionist demands. Now in 2017, the Zionists collude with super-power USA to manipulate the Palestinians into accepting Zionist demands.

Over 100 years of Zionist deceit.

#Anti Colonial

100 years of whingeing and whining by the Arabs (supported by people like you) who got:
1. 78 % of the land covered by the Mandate in 1922 and rejected the offer
2. who were offered a greater share by the Peel Commission in 1937 and rejected the offer
3. who were offered an even greater share in 1947 by the UN and rejected that offer
4. who gained control of East Jerusalem and the West Bank between 1948 and 1967 and did nothing to establish a second state - in addition to Jordan - in the territory covered by the Mandate
5. who rejected offers of statehood in 2000/20001 and 2008

Led by the nose by abject and deplorable leaders over the last 100 years and now led by the PLO or Hamas (take your pick) whose Charters preach to these poor people inciting them to indiscriminately slaughter and murder Jews and promise their families pensions for life if they are caught and imprisoned or if they die in the act of committing murder and mayhem.

President Trump has coined an appropriate name - "LOSERS"- for these murderers.

Hopefully the Palestinian Arabs will one day be given a say in their future - allowing them to break the shackles of a 100 years occupation of their minds by braindead Jew-hating and incompetent leaders who have never known how to say "ÿes" to the numerous offers that could have seen the Arab-Jewish conflict resolved a long time ago.

Deceit 1. Singer persists in conflating the Mandate for Trans-Jordan with the Mandate for Palestine, even though he knows they were administered separately. Transjordan began the self-governing process in 1923. The Arabs of Palestine were not offered 1% of Palestine let alone 78%.

Deceit 2. Singer persists in referring to the Peel Commission as though it's recommendations were official British Government policy. They were NEVER official British Government policy.

Deceit 3. Singer persists in omitting the 1939 White Paper. It trashed any idea of partitioning Palestine as unworkable. It trashed the Peel Commission's assertion that a Jewish homeland meant a Jewish state. It stated that the Jewish Homeland called for in the Mandate for Palestine had been met and that steps towards creating an independent Palestine should commence. The White Paper was enacted by the British parliament and included restrictions on Jewish migration and land sales from Arabs to Jews. It remained British policy till the end of the mandate in 1947, despite pressure from the USA and the Zionist terrorists.

Deceit 4. In 1947 official British policy was against partition, as extensive analysis had shown it to be unworkable. Why would Palestinians agree to partition, when after decades of administering Palestine, the British had come to the realisation it would not work? History shows they were both right. How could you increase a share when there had been no share in the first place?

Deceit 5. After 1948, the Palestinians had been scattered to the four points of the compass. They needed Jordan in the West bank and Egypt in Gaza to deter the Zionists from taking what remained of Palestine and give themselves time to decide their future.

Deceit 6. In 2001 Sharon broke off negotiations and in 2008 Netanyahu did the same. In both instances it was the USA and the Zionists trying to force peace on the Palestinians by having them concede even more territory. In both instances the Zionists never put any formal offers in writing and were deliberately vague about the precise locations of the land swaps they were proposing.