The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Barbie for president! > Comments

Barbie for president! : Comments

By Rebecca Huntley, published 22/9/2005

Rebecca Huntely argues Barbie's career success still comes at a price; it must be motherhood or career but not both.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
One slight problem for Barbie to become a CEO. Barbie would have to first put in at least 20 yrs at junior and then senior management level in a number of companies, possibly have a MBA, and be willing to work 60 – 100 hr weeks.

As well as that, Barbie would have to be prepared to be dismissed from the CEO position at the next shareholders meeting, if the shareholders thought the company wasn’t making sufficient profits.

The above would constitute some of the less glamorous and hidden side of being a CEO.
Posted by Timkins, Thursday, 22 September 2005 12:30:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Neither Barbie or Ken have genitalia AND what are their views on the war in Iraq?
Posted by Rainier, Thursday, 22 September 2005 12:37:54 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
CAREER BARBIE

One inescapable fact of life is: “females have the babies”. The subsequent reliance of a young child on loving nurture and breast feeding, has the inevitable consequence that there will be periods of time, at least 5 yrs for a responsible mother, (in my opinion) where her focus should be on that role.

Obviously, this would impact on ‘CEO Barbie’s’ career path.

Perhaps it is well past the time, when we as a community should reject the ‘equality’ lie that has been propounded by the left, and re-discover the ‘fulfillment/discovery’ truth, that a women will be most happy in the role for which she was designed. The birthing and nurturing of children.

To say the above, in no way suggests that females cannot enjoy and pursue a vigorous and creative career, but it should be tailored to fit in with the nurturing realities she also faces.

I maintain that there are untold educational and commercial opportunities just waiting to be taken up by work from home, educate from home women. This does not mean they are ‘locked in’ the home. It would in fact mean they have the freedom and flexibility to determine their own schedule and make appointments, which don’t conflict with their other responsibilities.

I suggest that the Biblical pattern of marriage and women allows for this.

The idea of ‘power girls’ is just that, an idea and more importantly a myth, if it were true, then women would be raping males and domestic violence would show them as the perpetrators far more than males.

If a woman wishes to have a business career, I agree, there is... a cost, and I wonder if the cost is worth it when at the end all she has is a bank balance, but no offspring. Have we forgotten that each of us must (not should... but MUST) be replaced, plus a bit more for those who die of sickness etc ? When a view of ‘femaleness’ which excludes reproduction as a major aspect of life emerges, we are truly dying out... really.
Posted by BOAZ_David, Friday, 23 September 2005 11:47:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BD - I will assume you're not even open to a debate about what a "female that has the babies" would actually want, so consider this instead: what about 1) women who can't have children? 2) women who don't want children? 3) women who want to be independant of a partner? 4) single mothers?
Posted by lisamaree, Friday, 23 September 2005 4:32:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Heh. Spinster Barbie for President.
Posted by Laurie, Friday, 23 September 2005 4:34:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
In case anyone gets Barbie confused with Britney - here's how you remember:

One is a plastic, fabricated, made up toy marketing ploy designed for and aimed at impressionable young girls, available in a variety of different costumes and personalities. Then there's Barbie.

Yeah, I know, you all saw it comin.

Have a good weekend everyone!
Posted by spendocrat, Friday, 23 September 2005 4:47:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy