The Forum > Article Comments > Will simply building more public transport seriously suppress car use? > Comments
Will simply building more public transport seriously suppress car use? : Comments
By Alan Davies, published 23/2/2016Back in 2002, Melbourne's strategic plan set a target of 20% mode share for public transport by 2020, but mode share stabilised since then at just 11%.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
In any event the solutions are all going in the wrong direction, we just can't funnel more people into overcrowded congested cities; and just for the sake of billionaire retailers, developers and commercial landlords?
What we need a very fast trains and long overdue decentralization, plus the roll out of the NBN, to allow more folk to work from home or indeed run their business.
The cars of the future will be electric, autonomous and able to talk with traffic lights. And folks will be able to have their breakfast, study or liaise with the office, via mobile means as their personal chariot ferries them to the designated destination?
Town planners will build highways with a nice green separation zone down the middle, and ideal space for a connecting monorail!
And given no new land needs to be acquired, ideal connectors!
Satellite cities replete with rapid rail connectors, a CBD and industrial estate would limit the cars needing high cost highways.
Even so, part of the problem has to be security or the lack of it on public transport options? Large open carriages need to be replaced with lockable family sized cubicles and gender specific carriages?
Some of the planned light rail options could be replaced by trolley buses that just don't need to hog the middle of busy urban links, and able to park to the side to allow disembarkation.
They are a lot quieter than the old rattlers, and have more effective braking/acceleration, as well as vastly cheaper locally available fuel!
Rhrosty.