The gods of secular humanism are Lucifer & Satan. Here is proof.

https://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1100&bih=634&q=fabian+society+wolf+in+sheep%27s+clothing&oq=fabian+soc&gs_l=img.1.3.0l10.2487.19797.0.31227.10.10.0.0.0.0.397.2786.0j1j6j3.10.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..0.10.2784.-8lO55OOalA#hl=en&tbm=isch&q=fabian+socialism+wolf+in+sheeps+clothing

Identifying devil worshippers is the easiest task in Christianity. It is NOT rocket science.

1, using Satanic imagery, see above, tick.
2, using Luciferian deceptive language tricks like the word socialism to hide your ANTI-social policies, tick.
3, performing evil acts like ritual blood sacrifice, islamic terrorism, imported by Fabian ANTI-socialists, tick.
4, grooming & abuse of children, child marriage & FGM, imported by Fabian ANTI-socialists, tick.
5, "malice aforethought" planning in advance of evil acts with evil intent, tick.
6, consistency, these evil deeds are not just done occasionally but ruthlessly, relentlessly, 24/7/365, tick.

Multiple links to further evidence if necessary.

the gods of secular humanism is very similar to the god of Islam. Truth is thrown out the window.

Thank you Peter for this great article.

It reminds me of the poem by Yehudah Halevi:

The servants of time are the slaves of slaves
The servant of God – he alone is free!
Therefore, when each man doth sue for his portion,
“My portion is God,” saith my soul.

http://www.joabcohenauthor.com/2014/02/the-best-way-to-be-slave-according-to.html

Hi Sells

As usual a thought-provoking article, and I agree with some of what you say.

I think you’re wrong, though, about the values of secular humanism. It is not committed to the religious ideal of perfectability, but to the enlightenment idea of progress. Things may never be perfect, but they are better than they used to be, and in future could be better still. This applies both materially (longer lifespans, more prosperity) and socially (we can become a ”better” society, however that is envisaged).

On the first count, the progressives are right. Our material quality of life is demonstrably far better than was typical in the pre-modern area, whether measured narrowly by lifespan and capacity to consume, or more broadly through access to education, music and the arts, leisure etc.

The second is harder to judge because it is subjective, and if we judge other times and cultures by the standards of our own, they are unlikely to measure up. The more interesting question is how they would judge ours.

But I value the social and cultural fruits of progressive values – freedom, democracy, equality before the law, gender and racial equality, safety nets to protect the poor and vulnerable, and respect for the innate dignity and worth of each individual. These are the principles that “rights” language tries to express, and in many cases they were adopted from Christianity. I agree,though, that the ideas are sometimes stretched to the point of absurdity (Target Australia’s claim that everybody “has the right” to feel good about their clothes is particularly cringe-worthy).

Rhian,
I agree. However there are some distinctions to be made. Christian theology is essentially eschatological which means that it is always in tension with the future. This, as I am sure you are aware, is where we get the idea of progress from. However, progress divorced from the kingdom of God can be an idol that can suck us into shallow living. In other words Christian eschatology, the end of the present world and the beginning of a new world "in which every tear will be wiped away" has been subverted into becoming only material progress. I think we are reaching a saturation point in the West in which new technology has become ho hum. We may die of boredom! We might begin to think "is this all there is?"

Hi Sells
On that, I agree with you completely!