The Forum > Article Comments > A materialist creed: uniting theist and atheist > Comments
A materialist creed: uniting theist and atheist : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 31/10/2014The great strength of the bible is that it incorporated contradictory ideas. Thus robust affirmations that God is on the side of the righteous exist alongside despairing expressions of the absence of God.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
Posted by VK3AUU, Friday, 31 October 2014 9:49:44 AM
| |
Dear Peter,
Materialism is the attitude of valuing the material world, considering it important. Either you value and serve God, or you value and serve the material world - no one can serve two masters at once. Unfortunately, even parts of the bible (especially in the old testament) are materialistic. You cannot avoid the conclusion that the bible is a patchwork by different authors. Posted by Yuyutsu, Friday, 31 October 2014 10:10:43 AM
| |
YuYutsu,
I agree. The other meaning of materialism is the focus on the material world to the exclusion of (what word can I use without misunderstanding) spiritual. This is the dualism that Paul plays with, that between the spirit and the flesh. This is not mind/body or spirit/body dualism that we find inn Descartes, it is an orientation to the flesh rather than to God. Posted by Sells, Friday, 31 October 2014 10:19:40 AM
| |
Everything in the entire knowable universe is energy in some transformed form.
Given energy can neither be created or destroyed, it had to always exist in some form, perhaps dark energy? Not all that long ago we neither knew of or believed in dark energy! To propose such a thing existed would have brought howls of derision down on your head! Even so, a projection of dark matter into the known universe, and a transformation into the energy forms we can see or otherwise detect, became possible due to the possibility of energy transformation, dark to white energy, and light? And given almost anything is possible, possible celestial ejaculation? Certainly more rational than a big bang and something from nothing! Can the universe think? Well you and I can, and we along with all other thinkers, are an integral part of it! Is there a spiritual afterlife? Well if you've personally seen credible evidence, believe what you will. Others remain free to think what they may, or what suits their particular conformation bias/belief system? To those I merely say, seek ye first the kingdom of heaven within and learn to meditate! As for what to believe? It hard to go past the mighty irrefutable truth, and allow it to lead us where it may; perhaps one day to new homes among the stars? Whatever you believe, it's important to keep an open mind, in the knowledge you and your unshakable belief could still be entirely wrong? Or being lead down a completely false path! An open mind is just as important as an open parachute, and a virtual lifesaver, in many respects, but particularly for those following a false prophet to an untimely death. [It's not the fall that hurts, just the sudden stop at the bottom!] Importantly, there is some credible evidence for reincarnation and past lives. [Certainly more than a Messiah nailed to a cross?] Which then makes perfect sense out of, so as you sow so also shall you reap! So, attack poverty and disadvantage wherever you find it! Rhrosty! Posted by Rhrosty, Friday, 31 October 2014 10:37:15 AM
| |
But what about Sat-Chit-Ananda (Being, Consciousness and Love-Bliss-Radiance) a topic which Sells referred to earlier this year when he mentioned the then new book by David Bentley Hart
And yes everything is quite literally a play of indestructible Primal Energy or Conscious Light. These two references describe the situation: Short version: http://www.beezone.com/great_tradition_basket/epilogue.html Longer extended version: http://www.beezone.com/AdiDa/He_She_Me/Tat_Sundaram!_All_Of_This.html Hardly any of the usual dreadfully sane Christian propaganda hacks ever talk or write about Consciousness with a Capital C (or even a lower case c). They never ever talk or write about Ananda or Love-Bliss-Radiance. And yet Sat, Chit, and Ananda are the intrinsic always already indivisible tripartite nature of Who and What we Are in Truth & Reality. This Ancient Understanding of Reality is discussed in detail in this book: http://global.adidam.org/books/ancient-teachings Posted by Daffy Duck, Friday, 31 October 2014 12:02:48 PM
| |
Dear Daffy,
<<Hardly any of the usual dreadfully sane Christian propaganda hacks ever talk or write about Consciousness with a Capital C (or even a lower case c). They never ever talk or write about Ananda or Love-Bliss-Radiance.>> Why don't they teach Einstein's theory of relativity in kindergartens? Does it mean that kindergartens are superfluous? Christianity practices unqualified dualism (http://www.satramana.org/html/unqualified-_qualified-_dualism-_nondualism.htm) because it best serves the Christian community. Guilt-ridden individuals are not ready to benefit even from qualified dualism, as it would make them conceive of the nature of God to be as sinful as theirs. Nothing else can help them unless they first reduce the heaviness of their sins to manageable dimensions. Posted by Yuyutsu, Friday, 31 October 2014 1:34:03 PM
|
Man has made god in his own image to satisfy some inner deficiency in his/her psyche, no more, no less. End of story.
David