The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > My dear prime minister > Comments

My dear prime minister : Comments

By James Arvanitakis, published 22/11/2013

I wanted to write to you a list of the concerns that much of the population share that I believe cross the political divide. These issues are beyond 'left and right'.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
James - your side lost. A majority of people voted against that luvvie claptrap. Get over it.
Posted by DavidL, Friday, 22 November 2013 8:45:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
James,
you're only an academic, what would you know about managing ? Our students are getting more dumb each semester & academics are trying to tell us how do do things ? Get real !
How about concentrating on real research like how to make our students & their teachers smarter ?
This Government has only just clocked up three months, all of which time was devoted to sort out the crap from your lot. if you want this Government to do better than the last one then stop interfering & let them get on with weeding the Public Service.
Posted by individual, Friday, 22 November 2013 9:46:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Professor Arvanitakis,

To begin with, I would like to congratulate you on being the 280th progressive article writer on OLO this year.

You mentioned that you wanted to air “ the concerns that much of the population share”. How did you determine that the “population” share these concerns-- was it just one of these progressive things where if you think it is a concern then everyone else ought to think so to?

You then go on to talk about “asylum seekers” . The first thing that struck me was your use of colourful and misleading descriptions:
1) “only...a trickle …”
2) “despite the hysteria …”
3)" repel 'boats' at all costs"

And the second thing was just how poorly informed you were about the issue —you say: “the vast majority are confirmed as genuine refugees”. This is a very old chestnut that has been debunked numerous times. The fact that the majority may be given the benefit of the doubt and rubber stamped “genuine” .-- often after a series of long publicly funded appeals --does not established their genuineness. I refer you to the findings of one Bob Carr former Minister of Immigration.

Then you say “push factors are a more significant issue than pull factors”—again, how did you determine that? And how does this tally with Tamils from Sri Lanka choosing to by-pass culturally compatible Tamil Nadu --only a stones throw across the water --to sail across treacherous seas to – what you progressives usually label --racist Australia?

TBC
Posted by SPQR, Friday, 22 November 2013 10:18:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You second issue is anthropogenic climate change -you say: “There is now no doubt that human induced climate change is a challenge for both future generations and us” And “ no doubt that a market mechanism is the most effective way to deal with the challenges”."No doubt" is pretty strong stuff, how are you so sure, when even the IPCC still allows for some measure of doubt?


And your fourth point, one which you might have covered in one line but shuffled around about with ten. Is a call for greater funding for tertiary level education. Now on this one I can agree with you.But the way I see it, it’s doesn’t need more or bigger taxes –so the LNP can keep their electoral promises. All that is required is a diversion of funding from the illegal immigration industry, and the we-owe-the-world AGW scam to our university sector.

Have another think about it.

Yours sincerely,

SPQR
Posted by SPQR, Friday, 22 November 2013 10:29:30 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
the twisting of words by many of our academics and media is astounding. To call those with faith in gw religion progressive is really deceitful. Having wasted billions already it is really quite regressive to continue down that path. As for promoting on gender rather than ability we have just witnessed 5 years of destruction rather than progression. Calling these things progressive is equivalant to calling the Greens/Labour compassionate after thousands of deaths due to their 'progressive'policies.
Posted by runner, Friday, 22 November 2013 10:33:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
DEAR..TONY..your the first leader..i..havnt tried to contact
for..the last twenty years..and there is a good reason..for this

never before has the driver[your advisers]..been..more clear
but mate..your no good at poli-tricks..[loose the spin-guy..and what he advises you to..do

already they got at joe
that 9 billion bailout..you borrowed from..the fed..to give to the fed..is just one case in..point..FIRSTLY..thats only to bailout a broken system[any*money spent on bailing out the rich[by borrowing more from the rich

well..mate..thats ONLY BECAUSE OF URSURY*
you heard jesus was upset at the money changers,,[right]
well.mate..now you..know why

but..ursury..leads toinflation
[that has DEBASED THE QUEENS COIN..[the ONLY lawfull tender matey!

debasement..of HRH>>coin..is treason,,tony
high treason..[what the bankers did..was set up THE WORLD WAR
soits ADVISERS..could advise govts to fight war..by paper promise

WAR BONDS MATE..that were ASSURED..payable./.by govts
they even..had usury..on.top,,but cLEVER bankers..bought up the paper promises..AND DEMANDED>>THE PAYMENT>.instantly..[of GOLD..anD SILVER COIN]=

SOWW1 SAW THE loss OF OUR GOLD...plus the worlds feds
ww2..they got the silver..[and the crime of DEBASEMENT*]
thart saw evenour silver get STOLEN..in 1966

copper didnt get looyted[debased till the ni9neties
buyt mate your advisers wont even cash money[especially coin gone]
so opeople forget all about pounds WEIGHT..in..gold.silver etc..that are the ONLY*CONSTITUTED..LAWFUL..currency

further you..know that shareholders are mainly
other corporations..not pensioners directly....onlythe ADVISERS/middle men..that collude massive treason..GLOBALLY

we need govt to control the bankers..and advisewrs
knmjowable via their family trusts or gross wealth*

wanting to/do their USURY..[that links to inflation..and deflation..and stagflation etc..and thenthat final day..of high treason

the bail-in..and not even fiat paper

which is basically THEFT*

RESTORE THE TRADITIONAL..VALUE..back into..coin
govt pays only in coin*..only TO the living.[not lawful..corporate-[incorporeal]..'persons']

stop gifting 50 billion to investers
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=15734

thats high treason as well
avoids meeting joes wifes 'advisers'..olmate

think
what would jesus do?
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6040&page=0#176496

ask..john's.. adviser to explain..it to..you.
Posted by one under god, Friday, 22 November 2013 10:44:35 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy