The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Marxist-feminist fifth column infiltrates James Bond > Comments

Marxist-feminist fifth column infiltrates James Bond : Comments

By Richard Dobson, published 19/12/2012

Deprive a group of their archetype and they can go crazy.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
Didn't one of your heroes, Andrew Bolt, claim that Bond was going back to his roots?

So Bond must be one of those Marxists you are carrying on about!
Posted by Savvas Tzionis, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 8:54:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
How boring!
I much prefer the kind of analysis of the Bond films and everything else too to be found in Mad Magazine.
Posted by Daffy Duck, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 9:41:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A great analysis with a serious message. Gays and Marxists should be kept well away from things they don't understand, like heterosexual sex and capitalism.
Posted by DavidL, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 9:46:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Great article. Skyfall was less about James Bond and more about the farewell of Judi Dench. Now I understand why, gays are always fond of older, masculine women. This segues into my favourite Ian Fleming quote: “Older women are best, because they always think they may be doing it for the last time.”
Posted by EQ, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 10:10:08 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Never a truer word & all that.

This explains why OUR ABC was so enthusiastic about this latest film.

On the ABC, do you think those who work there would ever have meet any, "intelligent young white heterosexual males, who have been alienated by society". The latter probably, the former, never.
Posted by Hasbeen, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 10:48:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Leftists who write these films don't understand real men,and strong women, they don't know what one looks like or how he or she would behave in a given situation, this is why modern films are unwatchable.
To a Leftist authentic masculinity is horrifying, so they can only write horrible, twisted male characters,look at Elliot Stabler in Law And Order or Tony Hill from Wire In The Blood.
Another great example of how far down hill a program can go when it's written to a politically correct style guide was The Bill, I watched every episode of that program up until the rights were sold, after about 2003 it barely resembled the original series. At the outset it portrayed real men and real women, Jim, Tony, Bob and June were good,decent people trying to navigate the underside of London as best they could...look how it ended up, the cast at the time of it's axing were the same tortured, brutal and soulless caricatures we see in every depiction of law enforcement personnel these days.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 11:12:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy