The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Obama losing patience with turbulent ally > Comments

Obama losing patience with turbulent ally : Comments

By Graham Cooke, published 17/9/2012

There is a growing feeling in Washington Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing too hard for punitive action against Iran's nuclear program.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Good article thanks Graham. I have long hoped that Obama would end the US' blanket support for Israel and it appears he is going this way.

Netanyahu is a dangerous man who risks plunging the Middle East into a bloody war.In any case it is his country that already has the nuclear weapons; what moral ground has he to attack the right of Iran to have nuclear energy. He is mad to think Iran would not retaliate if Israel destroyed its nuclear facilities.

The existing economic sanctions are the way to tackle this, not military strikes.
Posted by Roses1, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:18:49 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Finally, an article on OLO about the increasing tensions in the ME and between Israel and the US. Thanks Graham.

There is little doubt among observers that Netanyahu is (despite his claims to the contrary) – either deliberately or inadvertently – interfering with US politics and attempting to influence the outcome of the US election:

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-secret-reason-for-netanyahu-s-timing-on-iran-war.premium-1.461300

This is being reported by almost all media within and without Israel, and all are warning that Netanyahu is treading a very fine line. Not only is he beset by criticism within Israel, but also by pro-Israel lobbyists in the US who see his demands as undermining the US political process:

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2012/09/12/3106816/boxer-lashes-out-at-netanyahu-for-his-obama-attack

The US is not alone in cautioning against a unilateral attack by Israel either – over the past month, visits to Israel by French, German and British diplomats and leaders have all been made in an attempt to cool down Netanyahu.

Add to that, US election campaigns by Romney and Ryan highlighting what they perceive as weak US policy in the ME, and it is easy to see we are entering an extremely volatile time. It is all very well to speculate about post November 5, if Obama gets re-elected. There is, however, less rhetoric on the implications for the ME with a possible Romney win – something Netanyahu clearly prefers and one which presents greater danger to the region (and the world).

Dempsey’s comments in the UK about the US not wanting to be ‘complicit’ in an Israeli attack on Iran, was Netanyahu’s first sure sign that he and Obama were following very different timelines. That difference has widened since, although there are signs that Netanyahu is starting to show some restraint in his rhetoric.

Perhaps he will be buoyed by this:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57513809/ex-ambassador-to-israel-u.s-will-go-to-war-with-iran-in-2013/

But I suspect that, for Netanyahu, 2013 cannot come quickly enough.
Posted by scribbler, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:38:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It won't be an attack from Iran that the U.S. will have to worry about. The reaction from the militant Muslims around the world, to the recent anti Mohamed video will pale into significance when they take to the streets to destroy American property and lives. Netanyahu is a very dangerous man.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Monday, 17 September 2012 12:19:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Don't worry VK3AUU, these Muslim curs only attack when in vastly superior numbers, or when the opposition is women & children. Boy aren't they brave then.

The sooner they try street insurrection in the US , the sooner the whole pack of them world wide can be declared illegal.

If they try it here, next time the cops will have to take it to them, not those trying to defend their home area.

They will find the Oz public, once roused, a damn site tougher than our pollies & judiciary. One could even say, may their god help them if they do, cos they will be in more trouble than the average cur can handle.
Posted by Hasbeen, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:20:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
These recent articles on internet:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/iran-close-to-bomb-israeli-pm-netanyahu-warns-us/article4548553/

“Having been rebuffed privately by President Barack Obama last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel took to the airwaves in the United States on Sunday to warn that Iran was only six or seven months from having “90 per cent” of what it needed to make an atomic bomb.
Mr. Netanyahu received sharp criticism at home and abroad for similar remarks last week, which were widely seen as an effort to put pressure on Obama to act more forcefully against Iran. And yet, less than two months before Election Day, he turned to the weekly platform for U.S. politics – the Sunday morning political talk shows – to make his case more urgently and specifically than ever to a wider U.S. audience. …” [cont in above link]

And this:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/2012/09/16/israeli-makes-takes-case-iran-voters/LgplIhE8jcObpObPXaDNtJ/story.html

FILE - In this Sept. 11, 2012, photo, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a joint press conference with his Bulgarian counterpart Boyko Borissov, not seen, in Jerusalem. Netanyahu is making a direct appeal to U.S. voters to elect a president willing to draw a "red line" with Iran. Netanyahu on Sunday, Sept. 16, 2012, used this week's focus on unrest across the Muslim world to warn Americans watching two Sunday talk shows that time is running out to confront Tehran on its nuclear program. It was an impassioned election-season plea for a world leader who insists he doesn't want to insert himself into U.S. politics.

“His remarks were an impassioned election-season plea from a world leader who insists he doesn’t want to insert himself into U.S. politics and hasn’t endorsed either candidate.

… Obama’s Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, has said he is willing to take a tougher stance than Obama against Iran, although his campaign has declined to provide specifics. He has also aligned himself personally with Netanyahu, casting the Israeli leader as a longtime friend.” … [cont in link to article]
Posted by scribbler, Monday, 17 September 2012 3:49:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Indeed a real tinder box. The Israel PM does appear to be agressive, very aggressive. The mere thought and probability of a nuclear war in the Middle East, is just too horrible to contemplate.

But while these two agressive protagonists continue to rattle swords, heaven knows what would happen if it escalates further, than just mere posturing. The US leadership with Mr Obama at it's helm is probably just as weak as we appear to be, here in Oz.

Somebody commenting herein, apropos the events in Sydney last Saturday, suggested if these radical muslim groups continue to threaten, and intimidate the ordinary bloke in the street, they may well bite off a little more than they can chew ?

That may well be true, history has taught me, that when the average Aussie is pushed too hard, they may well bite, and bite hard. Not so our politician's, it would seem ?

So, if these bearded, shaved head creeps, wish to continue with their bizarre activities, even the law can't/won't necessarily protect them.

It must therefore give us all some pause to reflect, just what would happen, if either Israel or Iran, pushes each other too far ? If a nuclear war were to occur. Then, it's my belief the entire world would be implicated. With so many pacts, and treaties, all of which would drag other nuclear nations into the (explosive) mess.

And in so doing, ensure the total annihilation and destruction of mankind, in toto.
Posted by o sung wu, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:49:34 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy