The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Can do and ought to do > Comments

Can do and ought to do : Comments

By Noel Preston, published 22/5/2012

Prospects for governance and ethics in Canberra and Queensland.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Unfortunately ethical people are not always competent and competent people are not always ethical. Ethical people are unlikely to follow a political career precisely because it requires them to compromise their ethics. Competent people are unlikely to follow a political career because they can usually do much better elsewhere. What do we have left? Victims of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome, mostly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

If we want competent politicians we will a) have to reward them a damn sight better and b) overlook their moral failings.
Posted by Jon J, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 7:03:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I don’t understand why politics is such an unethical arena. With two parties willing to jump on the tiniest perceived fault in each other, you would think that all pollies would be very well-behaved, wouldn’t you?

It should be a strongly self-enforcing setup – one party cannot help itself but to criticise any member of the other party who does the slightest thing deemed to be inappropriate and therefore should be extremely careful about keeping its own nose squeaky clean, in order to uphold the standard it sets for the other party and to avoid embarrassing criticisms from them.

Even if a lot of pollies do have Dunning-Kruger syndrome and are not the best people for the job – because the best people are sensible enough to stay right away from politics – this self-enforcement should still work.

Why doesn’t it work??
Posted by Ludwig, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 10:38:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"…this self-enforcement should still work. Why doesn't it work??"

I just had a frightening thought.

What if it is working and the current politicians are as well-behaved as they are capable of?
Posted by WmTrevor, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 11:24:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oow! I think you might have hit the nail on the head there, WmTrevor!

( :>|
Posted by Ludwig, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 12:14:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
private philosophy works its way out in public performance. The deceit, lying and cess pool of denying is no more obvious than our current Government. Private philosophy and lives have manifest itself in public policy. Adultery, blasphemy, stealing and loose living. NO character references for these guys unless from each other. One hopes the Libs might be slightly better. They certainly could not be worse.
Posted by runner, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 12:14:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have a couple of questions.

Why haven't you written articles on the questionable ethics and morals of Beattie, Bligh, Rudd and Gillard

Why have you only written one article critical of John Howard's Liberal National Coalition and one article of Newman's two month old LNP government. Where are your articles critical of the decades of Labor State governments, the Rudd Labor government and the Gillard Labor Government?

You claim both sides are morally and ethically questionable but the bulk of Governments in this country over the past 20 years have been Labor, especially since 2006. Have they been so much bettor than Howard and Newman so as not to require articles to be written, by you, specifically critical of them?

Are you showing the usual academic leftie bias?
Posted by imajulianutter, Tuesday, 22 May 2012 12:25:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy