The Forum > Article Comments > Australian Education: moving from 'good' to 'excellent' > Comments
Australian Education: moving from 'good' to 'excellent' : Comments
By Ian Keese, published 28/3/2012We have the financial and intellectual resources to build a system that is both of the highest quality and fairer.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The AEU is not a blocker, but has a legitimate role to play in defending public education, including teachers wages and conditions. It could offer all political parties an educational compact that commits them and the pollies to work together on agreed international best practice. The AEU should be initiating and championing demands that focus on learning.
Can I add that Jensen promotes trade-offs between class size and teacher prep time, but I think that as far as Shanghai goes, classes were traditionally even bigger than the 40 he refers to, so it's not as if they have raised class sizes in order to provide all the non-contact time for Shanghai teachers. If anything, they've probably reduced classes to 40 as well as providing the time. He is also wrong in saying that cultural factors are unimportant.
There's not a lot around on Shanghai schools in English, but if you've got time to read this, it's worth putting alongside Jensen's Shanghai stuff:
http://www.acel.org.au/conf07/papers/Xiaofeng%20Zhang%20paper.doc
Some of it sounds a bit boy scoutish - particularly the enthusiasm for competing to win appraisal awards - very Chinese. And the moral stuff is not so much whether to hold hands in public as how to cultivate ethics and virtuous behaviour - again, despite Jensen, a very East Asian cultural difference.
However, the standouts in this and Jensen are the opportunities for really collaborative practices that could not be accommodated within our school timetable structures. That's where I see educators taking back the agenda in a significant way.