The Forum > Article Comments > Queensland journalists need protection for confidential sources > Comments
Queensland journalists need protection for confidential sources : Comments
By Bill Potts, published 14/11/2011Court decision shows confessions are not protected by shield laws.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
There is no evidence, if we are considering print journalism, that there are any journalists here in Queensland.
It's been a long time since Phil Dickey 'exposed' what everyone in Qld knew was going on, and there has been nothing since then to warrant the title of 'journalism'.
The Courier Mail is a parish-pump primped up opinion sheet with no redeeming features whatsoever.
Regional newspapers are blighted with APN conservatism and unwavering support for the status quo.
The Sunday Mail, well, what utter garbage!
Oh yes, nearly forgot, we do have 'journos' who 'work' for the Oz here too. Well, the Oz is not known for any journalism worthy of a mention is it? A total Murdoch controlled mouthpiece for narowminded bigotry and hard right Roman Catholic and neoliberal opinion.
Marginally more interesting than the Sunday Mail, sometimes.
Wheelie-bin papers, whoever owns them, are good for the wheeliebib- those free rags that infest letterboxes.
The commercial radio and TV stations here, well, really! These have no 'journalists' working for them, only a vast array of 'weather girls' all trying to look stunning and with nothing much worth saying.
In short, there are no 'sources' to be protected in Queensland, because there is no 'news' reported.
I have not laughed so much for ages.
Thanks for the thread.