The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The true meaning of free range > Comments

The true meaning of free range : Comments

By David Leyonhjelm, published 9/11/2011

A bill to legislate the meaning of free range chickens shows that some subjects are really not the business of governments.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
The Greens will shoot themselves in the foot if this goes through - nobody but the most hardcore animal rights nut is going to cough up $15 for a dozen eggs, so everybody will just start buying cage eggs instead. Another win for animal welfare.
Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 7:46:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It doesn't matter whether the chooks are free range or caged. They are nearly all fed on the same pellets anyway. Nutritionally, the commercial eggs are all the same. I can't understand why people allow themselves to be conned into paying $8 a dozen when they can get cage eggs for less than half of that.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 8:30:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This was a disturbingly slapdash argument, David. The current dispute concerns the accuracy of the 'free range' designation of egg production. Egg producers who feel threatened by growing community consciousness among the minority who are concerned about the cruelty frequently involved in commercial egg production will naturally seek to subvert the meaning of 'free range' production: that's the nature of competition. Your reliance on the fact that the general public might be happy to accept 20,000 birds per hectare as 'free range' production is quite irrelevant. The designation 'free range' is meant to inform the minority who are concerned to set standards that will mitigate or eliminate the cruelty involved in commercial egg production.
Posted by Connelly, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 10:06:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If it was so cruel, the chooks would go on strike and refuse to produce eggs. They are sentient beings you know.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 10:10:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Actually, Connelly, it IS all about perception - and little else.

Since, as you admit, this is merely "growing community consciousness among the minority" and since "free range" has no objective meaning, why would we allow that minority to impose its own definition on a concept that does not entail any such definition?
Posted by KenH, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 10:53:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It is more likely to do with claims of free range. We do not have a legal definition, of what space a chook needs to be classed free range. Of course a chook would like no fences at all, but it is not practical whether it is layers or growers for meat, Chooks are farmed like any other animal or bird, so there has to be fences, it is a matter of space.
Posted by 579, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 11:11:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy