The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Republicans are singing: 'Let it No, Let it No, Let it No' > Comments

Republicans are singing: 'Let it No, Let it No, Let it No' : Comments

By Walt Brasch, published 22/12/2010

The party of NO, sometimes known as Republicans, has been consistent in its contempt for America.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
What absolute rubbish. Tax cuts usually end up adding to tax revenue.

The sooner the current president of the USA is out of office the better it will be for the country.
Posted by Sniggid, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 10:26:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"The party of NO, sometimes known as Republicans, has been consistent in its contempt for America."

This man - supposedly a professor of journalism - opens his essay with an outrageous pejorative, successfully alienating at least a third of his potential audience in the first 16 words.

I feel sorry for his students.
Posted by Jai, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 12:56:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ok, so the author is clearly not the least bit pro-Republican. He is biased and he makes no secret of it.

Leaving tax cuts and debt aside, is the author correct when he writes that Republicans: "..blocked legislation to provide financial compensation for the nation's first responders who were exposed to toxic ash at the 9-11 attacks and had to seek medical treatment."

The following (yes, it's an op-ed) seems to corroborate the story:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-kane/republicans-to-911-respon_b_795093.html

http://currentglobalperceptions.blogspot.com/
Posted by jorge, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 2:19:40 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Are the similarities between Republican 'Let it be NO' blocking tactics and Abbott's wrecking ball tactics a coincidence?

It seems the disease has taken hold in Australian politics. The wealthiest 2% here too have unscrupulous politicians ready to serve their interests with a 'whatever it takes' mentality.
Posted by Quick response, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 2:31:21 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
don't they forget so quickly. The total control of the US Congress by the Democrats, during Obama's reign resulted in blockages, earmarks and watered down legislation.

Obama's malaise is that he's totally ineffective. The Democrats malaise is that they are ineffective.

So obviously it's always the fault of the effective Republicians.
Posted by keith, Thursday, 23 December 2010 11:01:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks Walt for the look at America of today.
Obama has tried to improve life and life Expectancy for the millions of working dirt poor in America .
The No Party - the rich Republicans, do not want a bar of it.
Their Motto of the old saying, "Never give a sucker an even Break " holds true for them today .
They are not interested in lifting the lower working Classes up the ladder .
They will do anything to hang on to their riches, just as the NO Party of Tony Abbott in Australia will do .
The Poor will continue to get poorer .
Posted by kartiya jim, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 12:19:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy