The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The knowledge revolution and Conroy's 'Index' > Comments

The knowledge revolution and Conroy's 'Index' : Comments

By Greg Lees, published 2/8/2010

Stephen Conroy's assertions about why he needs to filter the internet have been demolished by critics. Yet he persists.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All
"...Senator Conroy's mission to filter the internet..... has little or nothing to do with child abuse and everything to do with political control."

Nothing more needs to be said.
Posted by Leigh, Monday, 2 August 2010 11:46:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Perhaps Ulhmann's theory on our governments proclivity to secrecy is founded on a sense of deep insecurity, that if the people really knew the caper it was, the politicians would lose their credibility, and then their legitimacy."

In my opinion both major parties have already lost credibility and legitimacy in my eyes!

I was once a member of the Labor Party, but I resigned in disgust because of several of their policies, however I continued to vote for them. Not any more!

This filtering idea is a shocker. It's one of the main reasons I REFUSE to vote for Labor this time around. I've written to my local member Darren Cheeseman about this issue and got in reply a short, cheap email without any commitment which simply said my concerns would be passed onto the minister responsible. Cheeseman most certainly won't get my vote either.

When the only choice is between two stale old political parties which do nothing to make Governance of this once great country interesting, then I'll have to find another alternative altogether.

This filtering idea is an insult to intelligent Internet users. The greatest pity of all is that Conroy's seat is so safe, there doesn't appear to be any way to get rid of this party grub.
Posted by Aime, Monday, 2 August 2010 12:15:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think I have seldom come across a more insulting and despicable attack on freedom than Conroy's insane determination to filter the internet.

And it is insane to persist in an objective when there is so much evidence to demonstrate the objective is unrealisable and unrealistic.

I have a suspicion that the voters who support Conroy in his mad mission are the same voters who want to stop the boats. It's the same mind set.

It must be extremely difficult for parents to protect children against undesirable internet content, and I have a lot of sympathy with that. But the responsibility to censor remains with individual users.

Child pornography is a vile thing. I don't believe trying to filter it in Australia will make any difference, because there will always be ways around the restrictions as there are always ways around every restriction. And you can't control a whole society based on the perversions of some of it's members.
Posted by briar rose, Monday, 2 August 2010 1:04:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Briar Rose,

"I have a suspicion that the voters who support Conroy in his mad mission are the same voters who want to stop the boats. It's the same mind set."

Your suspicion is wrong, and it is not the "same mind set". I oppose cenorship in any form; but I am totally opposed to illegal boat arrivals.
Posted by Leigh, Monday, 2 August 2010 1:58:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Leigh

>> I oppose cenorship in any form; but I am totally opposed to illegal boat arrivals. <<

Now before I comment on your statement above I want to be clear; Conroy's plan is a total waste of time, from what I understand child porn is available irrespective of the mainstream internet. However, child porn along with torture porn should remain illegal.

I am opposed to children being detained in refugee camps indefinitely, the harm from living like a prisoner is equal if not worse than the harm caused by a paedophile. Therefore, I believe asylum seekers require swift and humane assessment. That you would oppose asylum seekers along with "any form" of censorship is a dire indictment on you.

Children are starving in third world countries, refugee camps and/or being sold as sex slaves and much worse. While internet censorship is not the answer, you really need to think through what you are saying.
Posted by Severin, Monday, 2 August 2010 2:51:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Its hard to find pluses for the current Labour party. This is one of them. Anything that restricts porn and the inevitable child abuse that accompanies it is a good thing.
Posted by runner, Monday, 2 August 2010 3:00:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy