The Forum > Article Comments > Wilderness: its not the name, its the management that counts > Comments
Wilderness: its not the name, its the management that counts : Comments
By Roger Underwood, published 5/3/2010Wilderness is a political and an urban concept; more about ideas and ideology than about what happens on the ground.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
Two additional points. The most serious concern about the Walpole Wilderness Area is that, if it is managed in the way that former environment minister Judy Edwards wanted, then a bushfire on a hot windy summer's day will burn not just 5000 or 10000 hectares but potentially could take out the entire 366,000 hectares of the amalgamated parks and reserves. Such a fire would guarantee the localised extinction of many species of fauna, with several decades or generations required before recolonisation occurs. In other words, because of the creation of a wilderness area without adequate fire management strategies in place, the environmental consequences of a wildfire will be severe.
As for the Great Western Woodland wilderness proposal, most people don't realise that vast stretches of this area were clearfelled for mine timber and for firewood around the turn of last century, shortly after gold was discovered in Kalgoorlie in 1896. The unofficial best estimate of timber removal is 30 million tonnes over a 20 to 30 year period. The amazing thing is that, in spite of what the green movement would describe as devastating clear-felling, nature has returned the woodland and its biodiversity in less than 100 years. This strikes me as a powerful argument in support of continued human use of a sustainable timber resource.