Foxy,

Sorry. No help at all. Same old same old, by the same old people. No mention of a your 'human cause' branch of science either, which sounds more like psychology than climatology.

Foxy, which branch of science do you follow? Flannery and Gore or Plimer? I deny Flannery science every time as scare mongering, deserves to be in prision for the damage he has caused. Warragamba Dam will never be full again - people believed him and built-in flood plains.

ttbn and Josephus,

I follow the findings of reputable world scientists and
reputable scientific organisations. These are
available on the web and are too numerous to
list here.

Of course it's your choice what you choose to believe.

The same as it is mine.

Foxy, you have not named a scientist - just a unsupported claim. Give us some evidence of your position since you follow their science.

Josephus,

Here's a few names for you:

Julie Arblaster

James E. Hansen

Michael Oppenheimer

Corinne Le Quere

There's so many of them.

Wasn't Oppenheimer initially a believer in nuclear power?