The Forum > General Discussion > Nuclear Versus Solar
Nuclear Versus Solar
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You say that I lost my argument ( I didn`t know we were having an argument,....I thought that we were having an informed discussion) with my first sentence using the word "cronies" as John Howard supporters?
The word "crony" means "close friend or companion" according to "The Australian Secondary Dictionary". Coincidentally, the folowing word in the same Dictionary is "crook" but we will leave that one for another day!
Whether I am a Howard supporter or not is hardly the issue here, as Howard is merely the tool being utilized to try to implement the Nuclear Policy at hand.
I might mention that some of your "ill-informed" fellow students and others like myself, protested resoundingly against Australia`s involvement in the US inspired war in Vietnam!.....strange how some of us seem to have differing views to others in this community!
The whole issue of this discussion is the "folly" of the use of Nuclear Fission in the domestic arena and to proliferate the possibility of the use of alternative methods available, in an effort to avoid what could become another Nuclear disaster such as:
Hiroshima - Nagasaki - Three Mile Island - Chernobyl
at the same time we should NOT discount all of the ex-servicemen and civilians who died or are dying from radiation contamination, resulting from our own Atomic Tests carried out at Maralinga etc