Is this by any chance a "Forrest Gump" site?

SPANKY,

I'm disappointed that there should be any suggestion that it should be thought to be merely a matter of chance that this thread may be, as you describe it, "a "Forrest Gumpp" site".

In the 15th post to this thread (out of which 15 posts up until then only 10 were mine!) I made the express statement: " So I'll just use this thread as a little OLO blog to tell this story while I wait for other instances of time dilation affecting the red posting recency flags." And that is what I have done! This thread is my blog. (Well, not really; in reality, it is OLO's blog of mine, at least until the end of September, when it will, presumably, drop off this superficial mortal coil, and become accessible only to those who are prepared to select "display one quarter back". Gridiron thus makes its inroads, as you may choose, or not, as the case may be, to see.). Welcome to the blog, SPANKY.

Feel free to pose questions, or contribute to the topic as stated, or the topic as I may from time to time have seemingly refacetted it.

This thread is the Forrest Gumpp Dump Site! Hopefully a site for sore eyes.

Things are frequently placed here as a matter of record before the event occurs to which they may subsequently be seen to relate. The idea being that nobody may complain that they were not warned of what it really is that they may, or should have been, about, particularly at the level of national government policy formation.

Of course nobody is infallible (least of all one Josef Ratzinger!), and the stuff dumped is up for challenge, if you think there are grounds, or just plain don't like where it leads you. I just try to tell it as I have seen it. I must confess to a compulsion, wherever possible, to substitute verifiable fact for opinion. To this extent, perhaps, I may not be seen to be always acting as a genuine contributor to OLO.

C'est la guerre!

Ce la vie et bon chance!
Good one Forrest, keep up the good work mate!

Forrest
Thank you for the time you put into the Tassi Live Animal Export site.
Also for your detailed reply it was decent of you.
To be honest I thought it was not working a few times but as I work all day and often only look at olo late evenings I thought perhaps it was just my mistake.

We have had problems on the site but not with the tag of the thread not showing up but the tag itself.
We were told by olo that only one person could post under our tag.
Despite that olo allowed a thread to start questioning why several people did not post and each person put their name up.
It does seem a bit odd if not the least unfair.
So our integrigty has been questioned because simply as a result followed the intructions.
Call that cenorship of sorts but the surley censorship should be left to staff not other posters.
So we are under olo censorship as well as ordinary posters who also think they have the right to have their own Censorship as well.
No rules or murpheys rules seem to apply.
We think Censorship should only be carried out by staff and nobody else.
We are happy to abide by rules so long as people are not allowed to challange those rules in a public forum to imply we are cheats or hiding.
Of course the other thing we have always maintained is everybody should have to post in their real names. This would cut out much irresponsible behaviour thuss making the forum are far more informed

Yes we now see you do enter other threads.
Thanks for your attention to detail