Bazz,
Multiples of numeric division? You're posting gibberish!
Please write more clearly, as do not wish to waste time refuting what I think you mean only to find you actually mean something else.

And it's only the denialists who are ignoring the science. In the second half of the 20th century, Earth started to get a lot hotter without a corresponding change in solar activity.

When you say "Hendix Svenmark" I presume you mean Henrik Svensmark? His work regarding cloud formation is significant, but does not overturn anything climate scientists thought they knew about the effects of CO2, nor give an alternative explanation for the warming the planet has experienced in recent years.

Aidan, stop talking gibberish!

We all know any warming above the recovery from the little ice age is all in computer models, & in the totally dishonest homogenization applied to past records, giving totally false warming from exaggeratedly colder past.

Bazz, it is hard for the sheeple and especially those in the echo chamber to imagine, even for a second, that they might be wrong, or have been following a false pretence.
But the obvious answer is, YES, absolutely, we do NOTHING, or a better way to put it, we get on with our lives as usual, because we are not guilty of any of the drummed up charges we are accused of.
It as been said again and again that Australia's contribution of CO2 has been stated as negligible, at best.
So we can stop reacting to a false accusation, and start believing in those who are not invested in, and have nothing to gain, from this huge lie.
More importantly, now that we are beginning to see that it was always a lie, what are we going to do with those who promoted this lie?
We have far too many people to punish,even if we picked them out at random, say starting with Al Gore, and even that arrogant little petulant, nasty maggot of a sick kid.
I do not hold back the punches when I find that someone has attempted to punch me, so what is the world going to do about these criminals, or do those of you too scared to be shamed will all simply turn and walk away like cowards, as usual?
Well I am no coward, and that's why I stand fast against any wrong'ens.
Can't wait to see who will step up, and who will continue following the rest of the sheeple for fear of being virtue shamed.

Aiden said;
Multiples of numeric division? You're posting gibberish!

I think you are referring to this sentence;
You must know if you build a complete system like that you do not just
divide the maximum demand by the nameplate rating of a wind generator
and that tells you how many you install.

If that is what you are referring to, why is it gibberish ?
You must know that a lot of people pushing wind & solar as the sole
way of generating electricity actually believe it is as simple as that.
I do not believe that you believe that.

I went back to the original post and I can't see anything there like
your quote above. I am coming to the conclusion that you are making
up something like that comment instead of being more specific.
I realise you have done this previously.

Install three times the expected demand, then multiply it again
depending on the actually found wind patterns.
The number of suitable wind sites will decrease as the area of the
grid gets smaller. So more turbines will be needed as that area gets smaller.

Point out where that is wrong.

So show me where my structure is wrong.

Bazz,
I was reerring to your post of Friday, 26 June 2020 10:26:51 PM

As for your earlier post that you're restating now, I'm too tired to point out where it's wrong tonight. I'll do so tomorrow if I'm not too busy, otherwise it may have to wait till later this week.

Foxy,

I never said that we should do nothing, however, I don't believe that if Australia "set an example" that anyone else would care let alone try to emulate us.

If renewables are now becoming competitive, remove any subsidies. Power supplies should be based on cost and reliability not emotion.