The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Pell's Acquittal

Pell's Acquittal

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 60
  7. 61
  8. 62
  9. Page 63
  10. 64
  11. 65
  12. 66
  13. ...
  14. 73
  15. 74
  16. 75
  17. All
mhaze,

Foxy is correct.

Pell has connections: Pell - Vatican - the State.

Lindy Chamberlain was a nobody in the eyes of the State and she was put to the stake in order to cover up the actions of a government that would have gone to any lengths to keep the name of its national park from being marred by its inability to protect tourists from dingoes. Someone had to burn - Why not Lindy cried the mob.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Sunday, 19 April 2020 2:26:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,

And what if truth actually has prevailed ? Is that possible ? Is there any evidence otherwise, anything rather than suspicions ? Is it possible that the High Court got it right ? Unanimously ?

Do you think the right to take Australian cases to the Privy Council in England should still be available ?

Love,

Joe
Posted by loudmouth2, Sunday, 19 April 2020 3:27:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Joe (Loudmouth),

Perhaps one day truth will prevail.
As it did in the Chamberlain case.

Today - the high Court judgement stands in
this particular case.

What the future holds we shall have to wait
and see.
Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 19 April 2020 3:40:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What the future holds is that "Reasonable Doubt" will remain a pillar of our criminal law and not, as some dills would have it, a mere technicality.
Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 19 April 2020 4:30:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"So did Lindy Chamberlain suffer an injustice?"

Foxy is not going to answer that because she knows the answer exposes her hypocrisy.

According to Foxy, Pell didn't suffer an injustice because he was able to appeal to the HC.
By extension therefore Chamberlain, who not only got to appeal to the HC but had several inquiries launched into her case, also must not have suffered an injustice.
But that's blatantly absurd....hence Foxy ducks the issue.

So why assert that Pell didn't suffer an injustice? Irredeemable bias and hypocrisy.

________________________________________________________________

"we're all amateur psychologists"

Is that another of your fictitious degrees, Mr O.
Posted by mhaze, Sunday, 19 April 2020 4:34:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'So why assert that Pell didn't suffer an injustice? Irredeemable bias and hypocrisy. '

at least she is consistent with it Mhaze. She use to deny it.
Posted by runner, Sunday, 19 April 2020 4:54:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 60
  7. 61
  8. 62
  9. Page 63
  10. 64
  11. 65
  12. 66
  13. ...
  14. 73
  15. 74
  16. 75
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy