I read sometime ago a very moving response from a
Ballarat woman who's husband had been abused.
She wrote an open letter to Andrew Bolt.

Here it is:

http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/5934280/ballarat-victims-wife-pens-powerful-letter-to-andrew-bolt/

Could it be the vixen has recovered from the 1080 baiting? :-))

Dan

Mr Opinion,

i know. Pathetic really, but i don't think public opinion will support Pell or the Catholic Church.

but maybe some on here will excuse him because the church may have paid for his education, and not the people through public funding

This whole show is not even about Pell and his possible propensity towards fiddling with children, it is simply a question of law; the evidence was inconclusive, ticked off by seven judges of the high court.

The question will always remain, and the cloud will hang low forever over Pells head.
Circumstantial evidence forms those clouds, especially his involvement in protecting children-fiddling priests over an extended period, by transferring them to other locations for their own protection.

To me, the air around Pell stinks.
This ruling by the high court does not remove that stink!

Dan

Hi Diver Dan,

You ask

"Could it be the vixen has recovered from
the 1080 baiting?"

Perhaps "the vixen" had to make the difficult
decision to either stay in the shallow end of the pool,
or go out in the ocean. :-)

Mr. 0,

I assume you are making an attempt to be funny. I was referring to the shonky Victorian excuse for justice, and half-witted juries, not any particular offence.
Pell has been exonerated. A successful appeal doesn't make him an ex-crim. It wipes the slate clean. The verdict against him was 'unsafe'. End of story