Nathan hope you are not put off by the questioning of your reason to post this
It takes little imagination to understand any group from free food distribution on to but not only a local opp shop may be the one here
Thousands of such things exist,I contribute fruit and veg to one in season
However too do not name the group if you still believe it would harm innocents in that group
Secretes do not stay secret on social media
Thanks for an interesting thread but as you have seen my sympathy is with the victim always, secondary victims may blame the perpetrator but not the first victim
regards

This discussion does seem rather odd, a mystery "charity", (not too charitable if its crawling with paedophiles, they could do a Flaou style cash grab, and run a PleasePayForMyCrimes account), to go bankrupt for voluntarily joining the NRS, all unreported. With the maximum payout capped at $150k for the most extreme cases of abuse, the vast majority of payments would be substantially less, and certainly far less for both parties by avoiding the court system with its expensive barristers etc.

As the Witch of the North would say "Please explain!"

<<"Many non-government institutions intend to participate in the Scheme to provide meaningful redress to those who have experienced institutional child sexual abuse".

Many institutions INTEND to participate. There is no compulsion as any sensible citizen would know. Government can't dictate to charities how they disperse funds, and Nathan's non-existent charity would have nothing to worry if it did exist.>>

If various charities wish to provide compensation of their own free will, then their is no need for the National Redress Scheme.

The reality is, the scheme was put in place as a way to make various charitable groups pay, and for those who choose not to, the social stigma put on these organisations is that they don't care etc.

The reality is the National Redress Scheme was put in place for a reason and it was done to see charitable groups pay up. It's not there to provide general advice.

For those charities who wish to pay, they've had a long time to compensate in any form. Some have and others have not and charities can can do so, without a government imposed system in place.

Finally, in terms of the charity in question it is real and as Belly has pointed out correctly, the aim is to protect its identity.

Nathan with all the respect in the world I still agree with you BUT
A lifetime of seeing these horrible crimes, even being related to a perpetrator, we need to be careful
Careful not to even look like we're taking the spotlight away from the crime and its victims
On another site, years before I arrived on this one.
A strong denyer of such assaults ever having taken place, was unmasked as a convicted offender
Your thread is about a secondary victim
Let us again feel bad but not ever take the focus away from the crime

Still no evidence from Nathan. What a waste of time this thread has been.

Nathan forget the child trying to taunt you, it is not worth bothering about
That is unless you think this site is worth defending
I do, and doubt any good comes out of the man's endless taunts and out right challenges to the truth of others posts