Dear HenryL,

Israel Folau is entitled to his religious beliefs.
What he was not entitled to do however was to break
the contract that he had signed not to express those
beliefs in public. He had agreed to the contractual
terms of his employment contract and signed the
contract. He broke the contract several times and was
warned several times but he continued to break it.
Therefore his employer sacked him.

cont'd ...

It would be like an atheist teacher in a religious
school telling students that God did not exist
and that religion was mere superstition. Now
that teacher is entitled to their beliefs - but if
they were to express those beliefs in the religious
school - they would not have a job for long.

Sexual misdemeanor cannot be compared with any other dishonest activity.They may be economic offences.But porno corrupts people's mind.Sex should be personal. Only uncivilised people can post sex in public domain unmindful of the public opinion.
Selling one's physique for a price is the most basal activity on earth.They act in such pornos knowing pretty well that these may be seen by their own relatives including their own children, brothers and sisters.Only shameless people can do this and they do it for the sake of money.
Lazy people will invent some nonsense like porno and justify it saying it gives pleasure to many. Why don't we pause for a while to understand that it affects the sexuality of the masses.

Ezil Sorry can not agree sex is at the heart of who we are and it is said we think about it every six minutes
In fact Church's efforts to make a natural act evil is laughable
Highlighted by the huge number of people preaching that, who are sex offenders
Porno, if it is not using its stars is not evil

The word stars cannot be applied to porn people.Similarly cinema people also should not be called so.People who make huge money by some kind of deceitful activities do not deserve that name. It is like calling broom stick a tuft of silk.
Let us reserve such words as stars for people who really make some contribution to societal welfare. Certainly not to porn people.

Sex is a natural act but it cannot be enacted in public. That is civilisation. Let us not use technologies to make the natural act a barbaric one.

Foxy,
As you said Israel Folau is entitled to his views and I accept that but if he signed a contract to not air those views in public then it is correct that he be penalised by canceling his contract. He was silly to sign such a contract in the first place if airing his views mean't so much to him.

It seems a common fault these days for people not wanting to be responsible for their actions.