There's a difference between banning and restricting access. If you can't come to terms of restricting access like what is done for beer not being sold or given to minors, then perhaps banning would be the next step. I'm sure there's a way to restrict porn without banning. But if there isn't then yes get rid of it. Not just for the kids and teens, but also for the people who are forced or volunteer to be in that life of industry.

Restricting it might do good to ensure what is out there isn't going through people who are forced or minipulated to be in porn pictures or videos. That it is voluntary. As well as resolve the issue of kids full of hormones getting bitten by the porn industry and can't shake their port adfiction the rest of their life. (Same reason to restrict minors from being able to smoke).

Dear NNS,

Porn is already restricted, and I think that it should be restricted. A parent can get various additions to a device which will restrict access to certain channels. Porn shops cannot display porn scenes in their shop windows in most areas. Zoning would keep a porn shop away from a school. Most movie houses do not show porn. The viewers of porn mostly do it alone. The porn industry has the same regulations as to wages and hours that other industries have. What additional restrictions do you want that we don't now have?

' I believe that belief in God, the devil, hell and the nonsense that go those fantasies are harmful. They corrode the mind.'

you prove clearly that non belief in God, the devil and hell is harmful. Your mind is corrupted without need for further corrosion.

Dear runner,

Nice to hear from you.

It would be even nicer to leave out the
judgements.

'It would be even nicer to leave out the
judgements.'

certainly mean you would not state an opinion Foxy. I doubt whether you would remain silent.