Some months ago the MSM was scaremongering about the buildup of heat in the oceans, suggesting a faster rate of global warming.

The MSM got there info from a report on 31-10-2018
link to report

http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

Some example of the MSM scaremonger headlines.
http://judithcurry.com/2018/11/06/a-major-problem-with-the-resplandy-et-al-ocean-heat-uptake-paper/#_edn1

Some have updated the articles to acknowledge the errors.

** That is useless because who goes back months after the story to see if it is still true, no headline retraction, no wonder so many are sucked in by the GW scam. **

The MSM got there story from here

http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0651-8

NO MSM outlet or even the peer reviewers checked the figures they just blatantly published there scaremonger articles.

** Where was the mistake you would not believe this it was on page one, on the very first page nice big mathematical error. **

The error was picked up by Nick Lewis on the 6th-November-2018 but not changed till 19-November-2018 all the data was therefore wrong.

Link to error.
http://judithcurry.com/2018/11/06/a-major-problem-with-the-resplandy-et-al-ocean-heat-uptake-paper/#_ednref1

** No wonder the Global Warming scammers get away with it.
** NO ONE CHECKED THE FIGURE PEER REVIEWERS or MSM - PAGE ONE ERROR **

Origin for this article corbetreport.com

Video http://www.bitchute.com/video/PXLe87joQgE/
start 13 minutes 45 seconds

All GW scaremongering is wrong. But, where there's money to be had from taxpayers and consumers, there will always be lies. If the grants and subsidies were removed, we wouldn't be hearing the lies we hear now about a climate that has been changing since the year dot.

gw is a religion of virtue signalling usually by people who lack any decency.

I am now waiting for Foxy & Belly and a few others to now admit there might be a small chance they are being conned.

But I suspect they will still be 100% it is true even though it has again been proven they were wrong and NO ONE who supposedly peer reviewed it or published it found a mistake on page one.

Incidentally, over the past decade, we have spent $70 billion on wind and solar. That $70 billion is enough for 12 new coal generators that would give us electricity with a wholesale cost of one third that of the current level. Instead we have been closing down the more economical coal fired power stations because renewables, two thirds of the costs of which are covered by subsidies, are making them uneconomical.

Subsidies for unreliables is running at $5 billion a year.

$70 Billion would have been more than enough to buy back the electricity grid from private crooks, put it back in public hands.