We rarely, if ever, see much in the MSM about what happens to women and girls who fabricate stories of sexual assault and domestic violence. Thanks to Bettina Arndt, we now have a record of one such liar and her punishment.

Sara Jane Parkinson has been sentenced by a Canberra court to 3 years jail with a non-parole period of 2 years. Whether the sentence is adequate for her trashing of a young man’s life is debatable.

Parkinson’s fiance broke up the relationship when he learned of her affair with a police officer (also implicated in the ‘revenge’ on the accused). With the cop’s help, Parkinson embarked on a “crusade to destroy her ex-fiance and his family, with false accusations of domestic violence, alleged breaches of AVOs and a fake rape scenario where “she smashes her own head with a brick, plants empty condom packets ….. and claims that the condom used by the the ‘very considerate’ rapist ex-fiance was eaten by the cat”.

The falsely accused was arrested and charged and put into a solitary confinement sell for his own protection (he had been a prison officer before the bizarre saga). Four months he was there.

In the meantime, Parkinson planted stolen goods on her victim’s father to ruin him too.

Right prevailed in the end. But is 2 years in jail enough punishment for this dreadful young woman? I don’t think so.

Yes he might have suffered for it quite a bit, but he sure had a lucky break, escaping from that bitch.

Just imagine his life of hell, if he'd married her.

He should buy a lottery ticket asap !

Yeah. He's an optimistic sort of bloke. He has taken up with another woman. Hope he has better luck this time.

ttbn Here is a more complete article. Vile women, worse is from the start she was totally believed.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/act/how-fake-allegations-landed-an-innocent-man-in-jail-20190117-p50s0c.html

How fake allegations landed an innocent man in jail

The plan was to say that he had raped her. But Canberra prosecutors told a court on Thursday that the 28-year-old woman had begun spinning the stories she would later tell to police a month earlier.

The couple's relationship had ended when in February 2014 the woman's ex partner started a court case to sell their Bonner home. The next day the woman’s mother put a caveat over the house, and the day after that the woman complained to police of domestic violence. Her ex partner was arrested in uniform and in front of his colleagues at his job as a corrections officer at the Alexander Maconochie Centre. He was given bail though the court imposed strict conditions.

But the domestic violence allegations were only the beginning. “How it can be manipulated so easily is astonishing,” the victim said at a sentence hearing on Thursday, of a justice system that failed to detect the woman's lies.

One day in March 2014, the woman sent a blank text message - an agreed distress signal - to her new partner, a NSW police constable. She also called triple 0 but did not speak when the call was answered. She sent another blank message to her partner, and ignored the call he made to her phone. At some stage she had turned her mind to the scene of the crime she would allege happened. She knocked over a peg basket, ripped a condom packet, unbuttoned her jeans and bumped her own head. She lay on the tiled floor and waited.

Con't
When police arrived they heard a woman groan. The woman, who was a NSW police administrative worker, told the officer her ex had come to the house, made her kneel on the ground outside and hit her head on a retaining wall. She claimed not to remember how she got inside, but as prosecutors would later argue she was planting the seeds that would eventually lead to her alleging her ex had raped her. Because her jeans were undone police sent her to hospital for assessment for a sexual assault. Later that night when police returned to the house, she drip fed officers more of the story. He had actually hit her head twice on the retaining wall. He had come in and grabbed her and yelled how he was not "f--king going to jail" because of her. She had blacked out and then crawled inside.

The victim, who had that morning been sleeping in the granny flat at his parent's house, was arrested again in front of his family and charged with assaulting the woman. This time he was refused bail, and because of his job was sent to Goulburn SuperMax prison where he was confined to a cell 23 hours a day on charges he did not commit and in constant fear the other inmates would discover who he was and kill him.

As more "memories" came back to the woman she gave another statement. She knocked the peg basket at the victim as he approached. He had grabbed her throat with one hand and held a brick in his other. He dragged her to the retaining wall. He pulled down her jeans and threw a condom packet at her. He raped her while she struggled. Later testing showed there was strong support that DNA on the condom wrapper came from the woman, while the victim's DNA was excluded. It was also excluded from forensic swabs.

The woman turned her attention to the man's family. She told police a man had run her off the road and used a knife to attack her. She said he had a car like her ex partner's father. Police found a steak knife at the scene but it matched the ones at her house, and regardless the allegations were inconsistent with her injuries. She pointed the finger at her ex partner's family as suspects in more crimes. She alleged they had broken into her home and stolen her iPad. Police found the iPad wrapped in a dishtowel and in a plastic bag on the grass verge at the ex partner's family home. She denied going there that day but the GPS on her car - installed by police to protect her - said otherwise. These stories raised police suspicions and caused them to reassess the rape claim and later charge the woman with making fake allegations.

The fake allegations left a family broken and their trust in police, prosecutors and the court shattered. Their voices burned with anger and frustration as they addressed the court at Thursday's sentence hearing. They blamed the woman - who avoided their glares from the witness box - but they were also brutal in their assessment of NSW and ACT police, lawyers and the judiciary and the justice system. Their son was not afforded the presumption of innocence, they accused. The victim’s dad stood as he delivered a devastating account of the miscarriage of justice they had suffered following the complex and calculated allegations levelled at them by the woman, once she learned police were a "gullible and willing accessory". The ending of a 36 year long marriage, some $300,000 in legal fees and associated costs of dealing with the fallout. The family had learned to keep diaries and photographs of their daily activities in constant vigilance, to wave at surveillance cameras and log every movement in case she sent yet another allegation their way. They reserved praise only for the detective who later picked up the case and saw it through to the end.

False allegations, particularly of rape, are easy to make and difficult to prosecute, prosecutor Trent Hickey told the packed ACT Magistrates Court on Thursday. This was a crime committed not just against one family. It was committed against the community and against real victims of assault and domestic violence. Fake allegations are a waste of valuable police time and resources, in this case the price was some 900 man hours and $43,000. Such prosecutions are so rare that before now there is not one example of a person in Canberra being sentenced for the crime.

Forensic psychiatrists diagnosed no mental illness in the woman, leaving Mr Hickey to conclude that she was motivated by greed and "plain old maliciousness". The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had no criminal history but her lawyers had little to offer in mitigation: references from family who continue to support her, and a plea of guilt though it had come years after the fact.

Before she was sentenced the woman stood in white pants, red floral top and flat tan shoes, with her dark hair pulled back into a neat bun. The gold chain with a cross around her neck, a gold watch and earrings had already been removed and handed to family. The charges were of public mischief, for the allegations against the family, and making a false allegation, of assault against her ex partner. Magistrate Beth Campbell sentenced the woman to just over three years in jail, setting a non-parole period of two years. The woman did not react.

"The administration of justice in the territory has been significantly damaged by the offender's conduct," Ms Campbell said. The magistrate also said the woman had exploited how seriously police and the justice system now took such allegations and at the same time had undermined the process and all victims of domestic violence. The family’s victim impact statements were moving and distressing. They were deeply and justifiably aggrieved. She told the family that their complaints of the failings of the legal system had not fallen on deaf ears;

Two years enough? Not even close.

The man's life was put in danger in prison. His father spent years of distress waiting for the call to say his son had died at the hands of some disgruntled prisoner. His parent's marriage was destroyed. The family is in hock up to their necks.

Two years paid vacation on the taxpayers buck.

Justice system? I can't see it.

She should be doing 10. And at the end of it forced to work to pay for his legal bills. And be put on a sex offenders register for life so that any other poor bastard who meets her has a fighting chance of getting out unscathed.

we saw the women coming forward against Kavanaugh as leftist liars willing to be total low lifes in order to bring a man down with no evidence. Probably part of 'women's' studies at unis I suspect.

I don't know how the man's parents, at their time of life, will ever recover financial. I would have thought up to 10 years would have been a fitting sentence.

And, to think this creature is one of those that the man-haters demand that we 'believe' because nobody makes up stories like that

I suspect he will sue the hell out of someone.

I heard recently of a case where a schoolgirl told her school that she was pregnant and with the presumed aid of her mother faked a pregnancy.
She alleged that her uncle was the father; usual consequences.
Eventually, she was medically examined and found to be a virgin.

Seems that there were bad feelings over some family financial matters.

She was initially believed but some doubt set in after she told schoolmates that the baby had died.

Is Mise There was a case in the UK year or so ago 1 female on 3 separate occasions had someone arrested and jailed for rape, she only got found out when on the 4th time one of the coppers remembered her from before and more thoroughly investigated.

It is more common that the allegations are real than not but the lies told by a few do no help.

Hard to believe that mother and daughter were stupid enough to believe that one had legs. They really epected that the 'pregnancy' wouldn't have to be proved?

The intelligence level reminds me of the guy caught with drugs then goes into the police station to ask for them back while he has more drugs in his pocket, so instead of 1 conviction he now will have 2. Comedy could not even come up with stupidity like that.

these false accusers do more harm to those who are genuinely raped or abused than anyone else. Pity the numbers of false accusers seem to be growing as feminism/Marxist spreads.

I just watched the Red Pill, a movie made by a young lady on the men's movement in North America, thinking that she would be confirming the misogyny accusations. She wrapped the film with a very different idea, and has since ceased calling herself a feminist.

I'm not one for stirring up women: been married for over 50 years. But the Red Pill is worth a look. On Google for $5 hire.

Ttbn- It was an interesting movie.

CM,

I really loved the piece with the orange hair! I don't think she went to finishing school.

otoh...

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/bryan-singers-accusers-speak-out/580462/

The reputable ABC according to some. Rape is one crime too many people believe without hesitation.
ABC apologises for 'error' over five-year-old asylum seeker rape claims on Nauru Date February 8, 2016 - 9:49PM

The ABC has admitted to an "error" in a story that claimed a five-year-old raped at Nauru was slated to return to the island and face his attacker, after immigration officials on Monday labelled the report a "figment".

The report on ABC's 7.30 program this month said paediatricians had detailed their concerns about the child. It came on the eve of a High Court ruling that ultimately found the government's offshore detention network was lawful.

At a Senate estimates hearing on Monday Immigration Department

chief Michael Pezzullo denied the reports, saying "there is no five-year-old child – it's a figment".

He said the pediatrician who took part in the broadcast, Karen Zwi, "has conveyed to the department she doesn't understand how the reference to a five-year-old child emerged".

Mr Pezzullo said some media reporting of the asylum seeker issue was "advocacy parading as journalism" and "pamphleteering of an almost political nature" which bent the facts.

In a statement, ABC news director Gaven Morris said the broadcaster "acknowledges an error" that confused two different medical cases recounted by the doctor.

"One was an older child. The doctor stands by her statement that this child was allegedly raped on Nauru," Mr Morris said.

"She also told our reporters about another of her patients, a five-year-old who was allegedly sexually assaulted on Nauru. Our story incorrectly used quotes about the older child in referring to the younger child."

The broadcast also wrongly referred to the incident as a rape, rather than an alleged rape, he said, adding "ABC News apologises for the errors and confusion".

Department official Cheryl-anne Moy told the Senate hearing the incident involved "physical skin-to-skin contact" and the child was "more than double the age of five".

She said the attacker was another child transferee.

'Attention-seeking' woman is found guilty of falsely accusing 15 men of rape and sexual assault after claiming she was a lesbian 'and would never have sex with a man'

A fantasist who made up bogus rape and sex assault claims against 15 men in three years just for 'attention' today finally faces jail for her 'appalling lies'.

Jemma Beale claimed to be a lesbian with 'no desire' to sleep with men and her bogus complaints to police led to Mahad Cassim serving two years in jail.

She told police Mr Cassim raped her after offering to give her a lift home - but in fact she got out of the car and told him: 'Get your pants down.'

Beale, from Middlesex, was even then awarded £11,000 in compensation while Mr Cassim languished behind bars.

She would even injure herself and use self-inflicted cuts and bruises against the 15 victims she falsely accused of sex attacks - including one who fled the country with his life in tatters.

Rest of article better read here beyond belief her actions.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4671800/Woman-guilty-falsely-accusing-15-men-rape.html

Yes, they are everywhere and they should be exposed and punished. Thanks for that, Philip.

Think I will leave this one now, but do acknowledge as others do the number of real cases far outweigh the vile false accusers.

A stronger message should be sent by the legal system for false claims.

Interesting comments here.

Does anyone remember this gem...
Cat Person- Kristen Roupenian
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/cat-person

I think my slant on this was different than the intended #metoo's.

Posted by ttbn
I really loved the piece with the orange hair! I don't think she went to finishing school.

Answer- I don't remember the orange hair. Perhaps I need to watch it again

Obviously her actions were abominable.
But so too is this thread title. This is nothing to do with the #Metoo movement, which is about the victims (or survivors as some of them prefer to be known as) not the perpetrators or alleged perpetrators.