So much for being refugees, country shoppers more like it.

Forty of the 300 Nauru refugees who elected to resettle in America are pleading to come back because 'it's the land of the free but there are a lot of catches'

Forty of the 300 refugees who left Nauru to resettle in the U.S. are pleading to come back to the island after claiming life in America is more difficult than they expected.

Nauru's President Baron Waqa told The Australian that life on Nauru is much cheaper, allowing refugees holidays to Fiji, healthcare, free housing and jobs.

He said it is not surprising some refugees have asked to come back.

'The US is a difficult place to live with a lot of competition when it comes to work,' he said.

'It is the land of the free but there are a lot of catches.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6393585/Forty-300-Nauru-refugees-elected-resettle-U-S-pleading-come-back.html

//allowing refugees holidays to Fiji, healthcare, free housing and jobs.//

I find that hard to believe. Nauru is an economic basket case:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nauru#Economy

Unemployment at 90% and they're giving free housing and jobs to refugees? Pull the other one, President Waqa, it plays Jingle Bells.

Why does the Daily Mail bother printing this crap? And why do people accept it as gospel when it's obvious bollocks?

'Why does the Daily Mail bother printing this crap?'

because pigheaded people like you won't accept any facts or truth that reveals the failed dogmas you quote. Even the sbs has been dragged kicking and screaming having to admit the lies they have been telling for years.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/nauru-president-claims-refugees-resettled-in-us-are-trying-to-return

Toni Lavis 1st don't forget Australia pays for them plus extra to get it done.

If it is a lie I guarantee it will quickly be called out in the media, or by the refugee advocates if they do you are right, if they do not it is you who is talking crap.

To be reviewed in a few days to determine who is right.

I had a strange thought today, and it's still probably difficult to articulate.
In a glimpse I could see it, and then the thought was gone almost before I could write it down.
Sometimes I look too deep into things so bear with me here...

I've told you all before that all these smaller progressive battles 'feminism, equality, racism etc.' are just distractions (meant to divide us against each other) from the bigger goal.
Which is: New World Order, and a One World Government.
[Now, put this thought to the side]

What if I said something really nutty?
- Now, again bear with me on this -

What if I said 'Racism is essential to Nationalism'?;
Could we test this argument on its own merits and just see where we go?

Is 'Nationalism' essentially 'Tribalism'?
And without 'Tribalism', is there any real Sovereign National Identity and Culture?
Without tribalism; and adherence to a particular set of ideals or principles - what makes Australia different to any other Western country?

Why must the idea of 'Racism' HAVE to mean something bad?

Why must it be associated with 'ATTACK' or 'ABUSE' on the basis of being different?
Why can't we acknowledge that different countries and cultures are essentially different?

Or do we actually believe that Chinese are the same as Mexicans or Africans?

- Oppose 'Racism' in all it's forms they say -
They want us 'Sell the idea we are all the same no matter where we come from'.
That where we came from doesn't matter.
That Chinese are the same as Mexicans who are also the same as Africans.

They always say Australians were (and are) racist; (and racism is bad)
But watch Kingswood Country, that's not really how it was.
Our 'Racism' , if you take a step back wasn't 'Aussies hating on Wogs', and 'Wogs hating on Aussies' in a hostile sense, it was more of a kind of 'initiation into Australian Nationalism and Culture', a right of passage to become an 'Aussie' and adopt our culture.

Ted and Bruno were actually mates.

And so:

If you attack 'Racism' in all it's forms;
Are we not also attacking 'Tribalism' and our ability to have an individual National Identity and culture?

If your aim is to bring about a One world Government,
Then you need to destroy Nationalism in any country it exists, right?
You can't build something new without tearing down the old.
- Push immigrants and have us in-fighting and divided (in every country) on all these previously mentioned smaller arguments that don't matter.

So we now identify and are 'tribal' with the smaller PC issues, instead of our original National Identity basis, which is eroded away by immigrants and PC.

So now, as a result we are the same in every single country, ALL overwhelmed and ALL in-fighting over the same PC correct BS...
ALL Generic.

Now no western country has any real National Identity anymore,
And every countries national identity is essentially 'PC'.

Why?
Do we not ALL fall for it?
Every single one of us?

"That racism is bad and we must oppose it in all it's forms."

Look Closer:

The whole idea of 'Attack Racism in all it's forms';
What is the default inevitable outcome?

Answer = 'Globalism'.

I don't know if my logic made sense, but there you have it.

- It's another Trojan Horse, designed to trick us into selling the country out. -