The Forum > General Discussion > At last, a truly moderate Muslim leader.
At last, a truly moderate Muslim leader.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
Posted by Is Mise, Friday, 5 October 2018 6:35:13 PM
| |
Is Mise,
The following link may clarify things for you regarding The Daily Telegraph article on Hilaly. http://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/arabic/en/article/2018/09/29/australias-grand-mufti-confirms-he-only-legitimate-mufti Posted by Foxy, Friday, 5 October 2018 7:00:55 PM
| |
Foxy,
So the Daily Telegraph did not invent the whole thing just to sell newspapers, there is some truth in it after all. Thanks for the link. Posted by Is Mise, Friday, 5 October 2018 7:10:29 PM
| |
Is Mise,
If a few disheartened Catholics would have got together and declared a new church leader instead of Cardinal Pell a few years ago - would that have worked do you think - without proper procedure being followed Even though they were strongly opposed to Pell - and wanted him replaced? Would that have had some legitimacy? Hardly. There are people around who are scared to sit-down because they're convinced they've got glass bums and if they sit on them- they'll break them. You're welcome. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 5 October 2018 7:33:03 PM
| |
//Sheik Taj El-Din Hilaly is again Australia's Grand Mufti and it is gratifying that such a moderate should once again be in a position of influence.//
I really want to believe this, but it sounds to good to be true. I remember the last time this fella was given access to a public platform and the ensuing hilarity. I cannot recall who it was that gave him the moniker of 'the Thick Sheikh', but I've never been able to think of him as anything but that ever since. OMG, do you remember the cats and uncovered meat? XD Actual tears of laughter... thanks for the memories, Is Mise. Posted by Toni Lavis, Friday, 5 October 2018 7:54:16 PM
| |
Is this not the same Muslim who said that rape victims were 'meat'?
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 5 October 2018 8:45:30 PM
|
"Foxy has it right we all of us, need to know just how a poster here can say the woman who gave evidence against the would be judge is the dirt bag he infers, on what evidence?"
Probably on the complete lack of evidence for what she asserted.