//The Royal Family don't enjoy rights that everyday people never had as you allege.//

Yes they do. Or the Queen does, at any rate. For instance, she has exclusive rights to any whales that wash up on English beaches. And the right to travel without a passport. Stuff like that - mostly small and inconsequential, but nevertheless rights that everyday people don't enjoy.

//So, who to believe, the people involved or rumour mongers and the media who feed on lies and scandal?//

As with all things in life, the Scots. In particular, Frankie Boyle:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkJqbO0zHss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex0fgSKFsr4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNEIoSju-5k

Australian mineral rights belong to the Crown as a remnant of owning everything in general. This must include beached whales and swans also as in UK. The president of the United States, his immediate family, certain top officials, and diplomatic personnel are issued diplomatic passports, which have a black cover and for which the bearer doesn't have to pay a passport fee. He gets a white house which the British burnt down , probably for a park for hunting royal deer.

Regarding Princess Diana - there were three people
in their marriage right from the word go. Charles,
Diana, and Camilla. Diana did her best - but not getting
any support from her husband in her marriage - she turned
to someone else. Who can blame her. However she did
produce an heir and a spare for the monarchy. Prince Harry
was born on the 15th September 1984.

Princess Diana met James Hewitt two years AFTER Harry was born,
in 1986. Diana admitted on the BBC Panorama program in 1995
her affair with Hewitt.

All this talk about Prince Harry - is simply a need to sell
newspapers - the women's magazines lap it up.
Harry's red hair is a Spencer family trait. All the Spencer's
have red hair - including Princess Diana's brother.

There are red heads in Charles's line too, Charles was Diana's 16th cousin (there's a chance Belly for you to blear about inbreeding).
Both of their families had red-haired members, so it's not a surprise that one of their children is red-haired.

Isi,I don't know what to believe.
If I look at the pictures in your link, I don't see a resemblance between Harry and his grandfather, if that's what you're implying.
I suppose I don't care because he is not next in line for the throne, Andrew is, so he is not a priority in the greater scheme of things.
Now Andrew, by comparison, displays a much better chance of being Charlies son, if one was looking for similarities.
The face, the receding hair line, the nose, no Andrew has too many similarities to the lineage than his brother, so we can see where the conspiracies come from and why.

Foxy it is true two sides of the Di story exist, and more than probable Carmella came before Di started lets say dating
It however is also true she was a worry at the time of her death.
In the end the Royal DNA if tested best not be released ever
Pointing to a truth, many a bed has been hopped in and out of in the history of British Royalty, including its current occupants