"Once you have killed of or assassinated ALL the royals"
Is Mise has the life of Brian , king of the Irish , mead man of Meath, 45 rounds a second with blindfold , Lord of Pedantry.

The Venetians will be opened in 1 hour from now. Venetians first proclaimed one Anafestus Paulicius duke in 697.

Let me be frank, got far too flippant in my posts here.
Following some, defending my right to be proud of my Republican stand.
Even in defending one view early on the thread was/is and always will be an unwanted waste of print.
We got a few posts after that, Ise Mise, a poster I just can not understand, but have no lasting concerns with, made me forget.
It is my view we Aussies can still hold any view we wish, that my view here is not anti British, just anti a family that should be on TV just for the sexual athletics of its every member,, not asking me to bend my knee.
We will become a Republic only when is unknown
IF you are not aware goggle Diana's boyfriends, look for the question who is Harry's dad? see the photos
Then tell me a TV show based on the Royals olympic skills in bed hoping would not be a huge thing
Name? *game of Royal groans*,

//I think what you are suggesting is the stuff of the Barbarians//

Anglo-Saxons were not barbarians, ALTRAV. It's fascinating to watch you reveal your true colours, though. All that patriotic flag-waving on behalf of dear old mother England is a sham; when push comes to shove you side with the Normans... a Francophile in sheep's clothing. Well here's what I think of your precious Normans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JRLCBb7qK8

Won't you fight the frogs?

//The reason we have a hereditary system is because it is the correct one//

Oh yes? What makes it correct?

//If you people are so far up yourselves that you are so desperate to hand Australia back to the 'convicts'//

Yeah, the whole 'convict' thing is a bit overblown. The number of convicts who were transported here are dwarfed by the numbers of free settlers. I have no convict ancestors, and I am far from alone in that respect. Most Australians don't.

//Once you have killed of or assassinated ALL the royals//

O....kay.

//Until then, we have a rightful ruler//

Yeah, I'm not suggesting we depose Her Majesty. What I'm suggesting is that we change our act of succession... in other words, the crown doesn't change hands until the Queen dies. But when she does, that the successor in Australia be chosen by different rules than the British rules of succession.

They'll still get King Charles III of Britain and wherever, and we'll get our very own King/Queen Whoever of Australia. No fuss, no bother, no need for any silly rebellions or revolutions or any of your other violent fantasies, just a minor tweak to the rules of succession.

Toni, OK let me enlighten you.
"what makes it correct?"
Because it is so.
The doctrine has been so for centuries so by it's very existence and practice over the centuries has entrenched the proto-col into being in the current form, as it is.
Unchanged.
The ritual or the practice is not for commoners.
Toni, if you can muster up enough followers to overthrow the Aust govt, and any other challengers, you may then decide whatever you wish to be called and set up your own set of rules and proto-col for the succession of your position when you decide.
Any reference to convicts still applies.
Just because your lineage MIGHT not harbour any convict blood,(proof?)does not mean the rest of the population doesn't.
So I'm going with the fact that MOST Aussies who's ancestors date back to the period of colonisation, which by todays numbers, will be a majority and will have convict ancestors, I'll stick with my point.
Surely even you know that you have to end a line of successors to the throne before you can look outside the bloodline.
So yes for your plan to work ALL the royals have to die.
No we don't get "whoever".
That's what we have now.
So If you don't want a KING, which you can't justify, unless they OWN a 'kingdom', they can be a Prime Minister, President, Dictator and so on.
That act or even suggestion alone says more about your mindset than anything I could come up with.
Your comments are those of someone with a superiority complex.
Your comments are those of left leaning commoner bias.
What you argue is pointless.
We already have a Queen of Australia and Charles III will be King of Australia.
You or I can't change that, get used to it because that is the fact.
QEII IS OUR QUEEN! She is also the queen of all the other countries she still owns.
What the hell makes Australia so special she has to reside here?
She IS our head of state and that's it.
"just a minor tweak of succession".
Really?

ALTRAV try to be truthful please she IS NOT THE QUEEN OF ALL COUNTRIES
we can tell charlie to POQ he can not stop us please please stay in the general area of truth
stop insisting we must agree with you.