The Forum > General Discussion > Republic of Australia Yes or No
Republic of Australia Yes or No
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Page 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- ...
- 87
- 88
- 89
-
- All
Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 7 October 2018 11:13:23 AM
| |
Ise Mise in a thread, was it this one? a mention of greyhound racing popped up.
Bought me back to my punting days. Boy did I punt/bet! Student of the form read for hours before getting my money out. On form, you would not beat the Ambulance home in a fifth grade maiden. YOU gave me, evidence of the inbreeding of the Royal Family then chid me for not answering silly questions? Posted by Belly, Sunday, 7 October 2018 11:38:46 AM
| |
eh? not answering silly questions.
"Republic of Australia Yes or No" _ Belly , October 2018. For the Yes case : dibble dibble squat zero Posted by nicknamenick, Sunday, 7 October 2018 11:59:25 AM
| |
Is Mise,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/queen-elizabeth-11/11693813/How-German-is-the-Queen.html Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 7 October 2018 12:54:46 PM
| |
Is Mise,
My apologies for the typo - here's the link again: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/queen-elizabeth-II/11693813/How-German-is-the-Queen.html Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 7 October 2018 1:00:29 PM
| |
The benefits for changing to a Republic are questionable -
however the reasons for doing so are a different matter. We've heard all the arguments before they vary from - 1) Australia should have an Australian Head of State not a foreign unelected monarch who we can't remove from office and who gained the job on who her mother claims her father was. Also our head of state acts in the best interests of several other nations - not just ours. We deserve better. We need an Australian head of state answerable to the Australian people 2) Australia today is a multicultural society and we should have our own flag not theirs over ours. We don't need a "Mother Country," or a mummy anymore. We need to stand on our own as a nation. 3) The idea of a monarch as an Australian head of state does not sit well with the Australian idea of egalitarianism. We need a constitution that serves our people, not the monarch. 4) As for maintaining "tradition?" Denying women the vote was a tradition, imprisoning homosexuals was a tradition, executing people was a tradition, not recognising the Indigenous community as citizens was traditional. Tradition has never prevented us from making positive changes before. It shouldn't now. However, it's up to the Australian people to decide. As is often said - "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The benefits of changing are - none as far as I can see, and many agree. However the reasons for changing are many. The choice is ours to make. - Reasons versus benefits? Our choice. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 7 October 2018 1:33:40 PM
|
You said, "Well not even slightly surprised we will not talk about the issue."
So why won't you talk about it?
You've been asked often enough what the advantages are, actual material ones, that a republic will bring to the ordinary Australian, yet you refuse to answer.