The Forum > General Discussion > Why no
Why no
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by diver dan, Saturday, 28 July 2018 10:47:08 PM
| |
Tommy Robinson will be dead for police and government policies you obviously support Diver Dan.
You and others like you are actively trying to kill him. I don't think you watched the video's I posted, because I believe any fair minded Aussie would come to a different conclusion if they had've watched them. Would you like me to take the time to define that what I saw in those videos and that (in police and government policy) which I object to and that which I am alleging you support. It intrigues me how the collaborators ignorantly sell this country out believing they have the moral high ground, when they don't. Posted by Armchair Critic, Saturday, 28 July 2018 11:51:28 PM
| |
//I also dislike the way poor mental health can't be used as an excuse when a criminal is white and male//
Ummm, no, poor mental health has been a factor in a number of other mass shootings. Remember this one? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Aurora_shooting The white male shooter in that case had history of mental illness, and the defence unsuccessfully tried an insanity defence. Psychiatrists who were called as witnesses testified that he was mentally ill at the time of the shooting, but not legally insane. As opposed to John Hinckley Jr., the bloke who shot Reagan. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Ronald_Reagan Mark David Chapman's defence planned to use an insanity defence, but he instructed them that he wished to plead guilty. Court-appointed psychiatrists concluded that he was delusional, but competent to stand trial. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_David_Chapman I can dig up a lot more examples of white male shooters whose crimes have been influenced by their mental illnesses, but you should get the point by now: mental illness does not discriminate on the grounds of ethnicity. Posted by Toni Lavis, Sunday, 29 July 2018 8:54:31 AM
| |
Armchair Critic.
Yep I watched the videos right through. I was impressed with Tommy, but not the chick. I don't think the two are in the same league. Both are what I would call rabble rousers. Since Tommy had many Muslim friends, including four that attended his wedding, it is difficult to get a fix on where he stands. Either your for them or against them. Why would you think a collection of rabble rousers assailing a Mosque, would be acceptable? It's not quite frankly. Don't recall you objecting to Chinese immigration in the same vain either, should I be cynical about that? Posted by diver dan, Sunday, 29 July 2018 4:37:38 PM
| |
front page of New Dehli times today says it all. We are following the same path. Every terrorist attack the pollies and media will either deny it or dumb enough to ask why.
https://www.newdelhitimes.com/canadas-politicians-are-in-denial-on-terrorism/ Posted by runner, Tuesday, 31 July 2018 3:00:37 PM
| |
runner we know! from every side of the debate about terrorism we know, we see with our own eyes Muslim terrorism murders Muslims, those who hold to a different view of Islam than them, us included are murdered,in truth every one including Islam itsself suffers because, for some at least, that faith needs new definition, to remind those within it in the end every human is from the same source,we can not read the minds of the few, they do not stand out in a crowd, we and our leaders do not stand listlessly by and let them do as they wish, not for the first time our brave troops fight some one who can blend in with the people surrounding them, we never stop fighting them, and should be thankful our best asset in the fight is other Muslims
Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 31 July 2018 4:21:58 PM
|
Individual....
I'm awaiting your "truth".
Armchair Critic.
Tommy a Robinson should be applauded for displaying the courage of his convictions.
But it's also obvious the police have a priority in keeping the peace. Cronulla riots spring to mind.
There are no bennifits to anyone in that outcome.
Sections of society may not be happy with Islam the religion, but putting the Muslim population on the defensive is counterproductive. Peace is far preferable.
What price a few Islamic Mosques in the city. Ultimately, does that do anybody harm?
I think in Christain terms it's called freedom of religion.
And obviously Muslims who break the law end up in jail like anybody else, otherwise there would be no Muslims in there.