"So what's changed now?"

The background of most of today's migrants, their culture and their belief systems,

That's a big change and one that some are regretting and which most eventually will.

Dear Is Mise,

These people will adapt in so many ways over time.
The environment and influences in this country will
undoubtedly have an effect on them, and especially on the
younger generations who will want to fit in and be
accepted. This has been the pattern in the past. And it
will continue into the future. Inclusion and education plays
such a big part in all of this. Look at our history.

Is Mise,
Foxy said "Whats changed now"

In reply you forgot to mention 'multiculturalism' That was introduced by Whitlam in 1970s and really set in motion by Fraser who allowed the mass entry, against advise, of muslim Lebanese in large numbers.

That was the start of the rot as the emphasis was on diversity, the more diverse the better. Until then most migrants had one thing in common:- their culture was based on christen ideology. They came from war torn Europe and UK.

Suddenly we had people among us that hated us, our laws and our society. These muslim people have made no secret that they hold our country and society in contempt and that they believe their religious laws and ideology far outweigh ours.

Our grand children will condemn us for saddling them with such a diverse population and those that seek to overthrow our society and not integrate.

Yes, Banjo. Multiculturalism is the worst undemocratic evil ever introduced without our permission. People who support the insidious policy don't generally come into contact with the results of it. As with all problems, the people who actually caused the problems are the same people who should be solving them, but of course, it is too late for a solution now

…There is absolutely nothing to indicate where respondents live….ttbn

That is an uneducated observation . To the contrary, there is everything to indicate where people live in relation to their voting preference.

National party voters are entirely rural based; the stayed conservative of the monied and land owning rural gentry, that, (judging by the figures above) support almost 50/50 a big Australia, and no doubt, the Chinese chequebook invasion, gobbling up rural Australia!

That is actual evidence. Where is your evidence to support the stereotypical big business and its influence?

“National party voters are entirely rural based”.

Are they? You know this, how? You might be right, but unless you can prove it, it's just your opinion. So, there is no point in me arguing that one. I'll leave you to prove that “National party voters are ENTIRELY rural based”. It will be interesting. I can assure you that nobody would agree that your claim: “National party voters are entirely rural based” constitutes “actual evidence” as you so confidently claim.