The Forum > General Discussion > What is the quality of Indian medical schools?
What is the quality of Indian medical schools?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
-
- All
Posted by stevenlmeyer, Sunday, 15 July 2007 2:29:44 PM
| |
I need to correct something.
Some of the mentally-retarded "doctors" who carried out the bombings went to "medical schools" in countries other than India. One went to medical school in Jordan. Nonetheless the basic question remains. Do we need to take a closer look at foreign medical schools before we allow their graduates to practise medicine in Australia? Should we allow people who would not be allowed near an Australian medical school to practice on Australian patients? Posted by stevenlmeyer, Sunday, 15 July 2007 11:04:04 PM
| |
Trouble is Stevenlmeyer, Australia's in a desperate situation. Our state and federal governments have seriously lacked any foresight in past decades and we are now desperately short on doctors.
For that matter we're also desperately short of tradesmen of all types - hence the 457 temporary visas. I raised this problem with a leader of an opposition party back in 2000. The present situation, I believe, is making most of us quite anxious, despite assurances that incoming doctors must pass a stringent exam to practise medicine in Australia. That appears to have failed - certainly with the Queensland butcher. I don't see a solution in the short term. I guess it's "catch up time." In the meantime, I would say: "buyer beware!" Posted by dickie, Monday, 16 July 2007 10:04:37 AM
| |
I cannot comment on doctors but a young male Indian physiotherapist here to do some postgraduate training is considered to be so good by his patients that he could easily set up a full-time practice.
Is it possible that the variation in competency is just as great as it is here? Posted by Communicat, Monday, 16 July 2007 12:04:12 PM
| |
There is a good reason why so many Asian students study in Australia (aside from using our universities as visa factories). Simply put, even Australia's third-rate universites rank better than anything in Asia (with the exception of Japan, but they don't like foreigners much). It has everything to do with educational standards. So yes, we have a legitimate reason to be worried about this mass influx of foreign-trained doctors.
Posted by Oligarch, Monday, 16 July 2007 2:03:07 PM
| |
Both the State and Federal Governments have shirked their responsibilities for decades by importing foreign doctor en masse rather than educate and train young Australians. In the wake of the current crisis, why aren't the major parties scrambling to immediately address this issue?
Interestingly, only one politician has raised this issue since the terrorist attacks in the UK. A certain redhead, and it's not Julia Gillard. Stop recruiting foreign doctors - Hanson AUSTRALIA only has to source its doctors from overseas because the federal government has failed to provide enough medical places at universities, former One Nation leader Pauline Hanson says. Ms Hanson's comments came as police continued to question an Indian doctor, Mohammed Haneef, in connection with the foiled UK terror plots. ... Ms Hanson, who is seeking a Senate seat at this year's election, said today she was fed up with the proliferation of foreign doctors in Australia. "I have people that come to me and say, 'I'm sick of going to a doctor and they cannot understand the English language and they don't know what I'm talking about','' she told Southern Cross Broadcasting. "It's an absolute disgrace on our parliamentarians that they have allowed it to get to this state. "My parents, grandparents and I have not put my hard-working tax dollars into this country to allow for someone else to get the benefits from it.'' Ms Hanson said the government had not provided enough subsidised university places for medical students as it was cheaper to lure foreign medical students who paid full fees for their degrees. "It's cheaper for the government than training our own,'' she said. "Those places are for our kids, first and foremost, not everyone else.'' http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,22021935-5006786,00.html Posted by Oligarch, Monday, 16 July 2007 2:22:14 PM
| |
Interesting, every bomb has a call sign. Nail bombs in London are usually the call sign of ultra right wing skinheads. They are not the call sign of Islam terrorists. This smells like a contractor's job to me.
Is someone stealing the recipe, or is there another David Hicks type in London jumping the fence and contracting him-self undetected? I doubt the authorities know where to look if there is money involved here. I also doubt that the doctor planted his own bomb. It is possible he owed money and did it from blackmail. I'm not convinced that he was a terrorist himself, but one of the many that gets tangled into their web. The Doctor in Australia could also be caught in a similar web. I doubt he has a direct motive for Islam terrorism at all. There are cases where people are trapped into this evil web by blackmail, money and no doubt lies. It will be interesting to hear David Hick's story once he is released. The whole plot will be more complicated than expected and I think people may even understand more as to why our countries did what they did. No one is afraid of knowing the sense of chronology and objective reporting of events. People fear the unknown or the anticipation of fear itself and this is what makes them hysterical. It is an old horror principle we use in the film industry all the time. Posted by saintfletcher, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 1:26:17 AM
| |
There is no doubt that the standard of medicine in Aust is diminishing due to socialised medicine.There are some excellent foreign doctors and some very ordinary imported and home grown ones.We are only getting what we pay for.Make anything totally free and the abusers will reduce us all to the lowest common denominator.
Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 9:01:06 PM
| |
Hi all,
Has anyone wondered why doctors would resort to bombs in favour of strategies they are more knowledgeable about(perhaps with more devastating effect and certainity)to create the havoc that bombs would do? Posted by Ninja, Thursday, 19 July 2007 9:58:35 AM
| |
Post war ,foreign doctors arriving in Australia had to face stringent tests before they were permitted to practise.
I have had experience with two Indian doctors, one a young intern treated the nursing sisters as coolies .The other was a great person[and doctor] Posted by mickijo, Saturday, 21 July 2007 3:32:48 PM
|
Doctors construct a car bomb. To cause maximum harm they include nails in the device. However the nail are placed under the explosive. If the device had detonated the nails would have been driven straight into the roadbed instead of being directed at the hapless victims.
You don't have to be a rocket scientist or a brain surgeon to figure out the stupidity of this.
This is not a macabre attempt at humour.
I am not intending to be funny.
I am asking a serious question.
If this gang are products of Indian medical schools then just what kind of graduates are they producing?
Can we accept Indian medical qualifications at face value?
Should we be more selective about which medical schools' graduates we allow to practise medicine in Australia?
Is it possible that the graduates of some Indian medical schools are a bigger menace than terrorists?