The Forum > General Discussion > There is a huge difference between the right to marry and marriage equality
There is a huge difference between the right to marry and marriage equality
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Inter-racial marriages have always been legal in Australia, with qualifications in places like the NT in relation to 'wards'. In SA, in the earliest days, if a white man married an Aboriginal woman, she could get a lease of land which he could work. But he lost access to it if she died. Of the hundred or so land leases taken up by Aboriginal people by the end of the nineteenth century, perhaps half a dozen were held by women.
Neither did the government here in SA stand in the way of an Aboriginal man marrying a white woman: in all the cases that I have come across, the Protector in fact provided rations, services, etc., over and above what he was required to. In one case, he arranged the rental (and paid it) for a very ill Aboriginal man, his white wife and their family, in the city (just off Carrington Street). After he died, the Protector kept paying the rent for six months. In another case, a young bootmaker ran off with his supervisor's wife and was helped to set up shop in Adelaide, where he worked for the next fifty-odd years (at Glenelg).
Please leave this odious comparison with homosexual marriage alone.
Joe