Easy come easy go. The shear fact the UN did it in the first place shows how out of touch they are.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/869316/Robert-Mugabe-world-health-organisation-goodwill-ambassador-uk-Theresa-May

Robert Mugabe STRIPPED of World Health Organisation 'goodwill' role following outcry
ROBERT Mugabe has had his goodwill ambassador status rescinded by the World Health Organisation after worldwide condemnation of the Zimbabwe regime.

The 93-year-old President of Zimbabwe is blamed for destroying his country's economy and numerous human rights abuses during his 37 years as leader.

His controversial appointment sparked outrage from world leaders after it was announced at a high-level meeting in Uruguay on Wednesday.

The outcry over the appointment has forced the WHO to back down and President Mugabe will no longer take up his role as a goodwill ambassador.

WHO director-general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement: “I have reflected on my appointment of H.E. President Robert Mugabe as WHO Goodwill Ambassador for NCDs in Africa. As a result I have decided to rescind the appointment.

“I have listened carefully to all who have expressed their concerns, and heard the different issues that they have raised.

“I have also consulted with the Government of Zimbabwe and we have concluded that this decision is in the best interests of the World Health Organisation.”

He added that the WHO would nonetheless need to work with “all countries and their leaders” - including President Mugabe in Zimbabwe - in order to fulfil its objective to build an international movement.

It comes after world leaders including the British government criticised the appointment.

I'm a little concerned about what might happen in the coming weeks.
We're now less that 2 weeks till November 4 and the planned protests by the left calling for revolution in America, and gaining military training in Syria (posted links previously).
Soros has transferred 18Bn to his Open Society groups, so it looks like he's gone all-in.
Now if I were to consider what might happen:
(Call me a conspiracy theorist if you want, but the stage is set)

If ANTIFA start mass protests on November 4 in numerous US cities and go on an absolute rampage; potentially armed insurrection and/or false flags and attacks on Trump supporters etc, things might spiral out of control, conservatives might defend against it and fight back.

It won't take much for the Governors in Blue States (Democrats) to pronounce Martial Law, send in the National Guard and for the complicit establishment media to spin a narrative against Conservatives, and attempt to disarm the public.
(They could say National Guard were killed by conservatives trying to take firearms)

At this point if there's Martial Law declared and protests/armed insurrection/civil war the stockmarkets are going to take a hit, and who knows what could happen next.

Conservatives might buckle down and it could become a full fledged Civil War.

Trump and conservatives could be blamed, and Trump could somehow be removed.
I don't want to sound paranoid, but this stuff in in play, and there's no telling it won't spiral out of control, especially if that's what's planned.

America could also start a war, it seems like they've been looking for one.
If they don't start one and the economy tanks its Congress and the Bankers (or maybe Trump) who will get the blame.

Trump's supposed planned releasing of the JFK documents is apparently a strategy to expose that the CIA was involved and undermine the Deep State.
Apparently some intelligence officials are pushing for the info to not be released.

Public outrage has prevailed, and Nasty Mugabe has been given the flick. There really should be more outrage against the UN in other maters.

The problem with the UN As I see it, is the UN Human Rights Commission. And the problem with the Human Rights Commission is it interventionist policy.

Poor little South Africa is to blame apparently. More to the point, South Africa was the excuse used and needed, for the HRC to change tack from a passive to an active interventionist role, in Sovereign affairs.

All that is fine and acceptable, if activities are confined to protecting populaces from murderous regimes. But as we know, this essential role is now laced with an ideological Marxists bent, towards gender benders and other assortments of left wing extremism.

Australia has no need for this twisted “Church”. I'm not sure if Australia can remain a member of the general assembly, and cherry pick which subsidiary organs it wishes to be involved with. I suspect not. And this could actually pinpoint the problem!

I wondering just what effect yes-man Australia will have now that it has a seat among the totalitarian despots in HR.