Foxy "We are a society of tremendous diversity."

And all the male convicts wore pants.
There was a *uniform*.

Why would anyone want to concern themselves with what other people are wearing or not wearing. I have no problem kissing gay male friends on the cheek, they do it all the time themselves, shock, ones a cross dresser, and at dinner parties and birthdays I tell him he looks nice. These are no more a problem than touching noses with Maori men, and kissing dead people, when the custom requires it.
We certainly have some very fragile folks on this forum.

"Why would anyone want to concern themselves with what other people are wearing or not wearing."

Because of the context: There is a uniform.

School is not your personal life, like a dinner party. It is a communal activity.

If you are required to wear a work uniform, you wear it.
Children will often need to do this as adults.
School is about preparing children for adult life.

Adults don't get to do whatever they want, wherever they want, whenever they want. *Context* matters.
This is a lesson many millennial brats never learnt.

If you want to argue against school uniforms altogether, do so.

There have been several petitions against SSM by aboriginals here is one:
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/08/20/11/10/aboriginal-petition-against-gay-marriage

Dear Shocker,

Actually not all the male convicts wore pants.
Do your research.

cont'd ...

Correction.

Most convicts did wear pants. It was the Scottish guards
who didn't. Whether they wore underpants is still being
debated in certain circles.