The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Recognise The Intent Of Recognition

Recognise The Intent Of Recognition

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Joe: I wasn't stating an opinion on whether any amount was 'enough', or complaining about what should or should not be changed. I was just providing factual clarification.

I have seen you website, very interesting. I've been thinking of setting one up myself. My main concern is giving up anonymity with the risk (inevitability?) of hate mail, rape and death threats that women's opinions on controversial matters tend to attract. (An article at random from the internet: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/having-an-opinion-while-female-youll-need-a-thick-skin/article33054436/).
Posted by Cossomby, Thursday, 1 June 2017 5:38:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Cossomby,

That could be a bloke's name, of course - if you set up a web-site and simply didn't use your full name (there's no reason to) then you won't have anything to worry about. I've never received any hate mail (maybe tepid disagreement mail) or death threats, and unfortunately no rape threats yet but I live in hope. And on the plus side, you get some terrifically encouraging emails in support.

Give it ago ! What's your field of interest ? If you're typing up documents, allow about two hours per page, all up.

Cheers,

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 1 June 2017 5:52:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I’ve got a very ill feeling about this referendum to include aboriginal people in the preamble of the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia.

Not because of recognition itself, I have no issue with that, but because I suspect the government is going to try and word the change to the preamble and perhaps even the referendum question, in such a way that they can then use it to overcome something else in the constitution that is a thorn in the side of all Australian commonwealth governments.

While I have no proof of this at all, I suspect this ‘thorn’ is something that makes it harder to move forward with the implementation of the global agenda.

I constantly ask myself why does government want a referendum? I think only ‘we the people’ should have the constitutional power to call a referendum. I always feel uneasy for the constitution when governments want a referendum.

Already the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and the AUSTRAILIAN GOVERNMENT are private companies registered on the New York stock exchange and no legislation at either the Commonwealth or state level has received royal assent as per the constitution since the 1970’s

Dont beleive me?

Bring up any Act passed in the last 20 years and see if its royal asseent and procllamation complies with (Section 58 of the constition, Royal assent to Bills.)

God knows what will happen to our constitution should we become a republic.
Posted by Referundemdrivensocienty, Tuesday, 6 June 2017 7:32:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy