"people still believe in evolution": runner at least they are not the religious nutters who believe in Adam and Eve, Noah's Ark, Goldilocks and the Tree Bears, and Jonah in his whale. which one don't you believe in.

Bugsy, the data was never published. It was all on just one computer, so the story goes, which "crashed" would you believe? If you can be3lieve that, you probably believe Peter Pan is a true story.

I guess the green blob fraternity will believe such a tall story, but they will swallow anything that helps their religion.

With every exposed con job such as this, a few more genuine people have their eyes opened to the stinking cesspit that is the use of the global warming scam by those who don't like us peasants.

A few more people, who find it hard to believe our elites would try to do this to us, can finally see the smoke with each exposed scam, & realise their must be a fire hidden away somewhere.

Even our Foxy is starting to have a few doubts, & researching a bit more widely. When people like her, who only want to see the good in everyone, have to admit they have been coned the scam will be finished, & that is not far off now.

Anyone who can read this exposure with their eyes actually open will have to start to doubt their previous belief. Of course, some will refuse to look, in fear of seeing the truth. Are you one of them, or a gravy train rider?

I do not know where you are getting your stories from Hasbeen, but that is patently untrue. The data was made available to other researchers, who have since verified the analysis.

If the computer 'crashed' and the data was lost, then how did this guy get a hold of it?
https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-mail-sundays-astonishing-evidence-global-temperature-rise

He claims they put up all that was required on their FTP site in June 2015, including temperature anomalies, spatially gridded data land and ocean data, and the land station data associated with their analysis.

Anyways, if you can point me in the direction of the origin of the 'one computer that crashed' story, I would be grateful.

First from Germany, but JoNova now has the story.

OK, just read the JoNova story on it and you STILL couldn't get it right.

"all data was stored on one computer that crashed"

Bollocks to that BS, noone ever said that except you.

Anyways, the datasets are archived and available and verified.

I'll repeat the question for the intellectually challenged:

What evidence is there that the datasets currently in use are actually fraudulent?

All I can see is some guy getting his knickers in a twist because the data wasn't archived properly before publication. OK, I can believe that.