cont'd ...

It's worth noting that Terry Barnes also tells us that:

"No Australian media is monolithically biased as
some claim, but neither are they wholly unbiased in
what they report and how they choose to report it.
As long as the news itself is presented accurately and
fairly, editorial and journalistic leanings shouldn't
matter. But there's also no point in claiming
snow-white impartiality for political coverage if it's
not there."

Hey rache,
Some radio hosts say Hillary is 'demon possessed', but Larry Nichols who worked for the Clintons as a handler says she's a luciferian witch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HysOLOa5Bo

Now chech the Podesta emails 'spirit cooking'
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/spirit-cooking-wikileaks-publishes-most-bizarre-podesta-email-yet

Anyone who thinks the US was founded on Christianity is wrong, it was founded just as much on occultism, by the way.

The Obama birth certificate thing, it wasn't about Obama not being born in the US as many did (his birth certificate is fake though); it was about hiding who his real father was. Frank Marshal Davis was a Obama's mentor and a leading Communist Party member in Chicago.
http://freedomoutpost.com/obama-admits-communist-mentored-him-taught-him-about-white-racism/

Pizzagate - The armed man went to a backroom area and shot a lock off a door to try to gain access to 'underground tunnels and secret rooms' which were said link all these adjoining businesses.

- TO EXPOSE THE PEDOPHILIA SAID TO BE GOING ON THERE.

He never threatened to shoot anyone as far as I am aware.

There IS known pedophilia related symbolism on those 'pizzagate' businesses, and they have been related to Soros and Rothchilds.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3560069/The-symbols-pedophiles-use-signal-sordid-sexual-preferences-social-media.html

As for right wing watch, they obviously aren't right wing are they?
That would be like a Hillary supporter making a website to demonise Trump, and you'd find that credible?

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/mat-staver-says-right-wing-watch-is-one-of-the-biggest-purveyors-of-fake-news-in-the-country/

There's a fair amount of BS that comes from all news agencies, some more than others.
Who pushed Black Lives Matters?
Do you think this corporate media effort didn't get people hospitalised and killed?
It did.

Thanks AC,

I have been starved of crazy conspiracy talk for some time, so this lot should fill me up for a while.

How come nobody ever can see the hand of the Swedes in all of this, 9/11, Kennedy, August 1914, hmmm ? For the simple reason that they are meticulous in covering their tracks and NEVER leaving any evidence. Simple: no evidence, so nobody suspects them. Innocent little Scandinavians, quietly sitting up there making their cuckoo clocks and sun-baking: butter wouldn't melt in their mouths. Devilishly clever. But some of us, very few but some, are bright enough to see through all that. Next time there is some sort of 'natural' disaster or atrocity, just ask yourself: could the Swedes be behind this ? Hmmmm ?

If I never post anything else, you will know what has happened to me :(

Joe

Foxy,

Terry Barnes expresses it well. All major media organisations don't report incorrect facts, but the bias clearly lies in the omission of inconvenient facts and the bias of those supplying opinions.

Newscorp tends more to the conservative, and fairfax and the Guardian tends to be more left whinge. The ABC which is supposed to be unbiased clearly acts as a cheerleader for left whinge policies criticising Labor when it deviates from its "progressive" path.

False news tends to come from individuals or Blogs with particular agendas and no accountability. Mark Zuckerberg defined the problem well:

https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10103269806149061

with millions of "news" items every day, labelling news as false requires unbiased fact checking, which by the time it is complete is obsolete. Most of those that complain of false news often do so because they don't like the opinions.

Some of the most reliable news these days comes from sites like these:

http://www.theonion.com/

http://www.betootaadvocate.com/

Strongly recommended.

Marry Christmas !

Joe

Speaking of fake news....
Yesterday (QLD) we had this 'Amber Alert' flash all across our TV screens about this newborn baby girl missing from a Gold Coast hospital.
One got the impression from news reports that someone unrelated to the newborn had stolen her from a hospital.

This morning I was browsing the headlines...
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-23/police-locate-newborn-baby-girl-taken-from-gold-coast-hospital/8145948

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/amber-alert-for-missing-baby-on-gold-coast/news-story/f4786656eb05bc8b91f40be707a0203a

- From yesterday -
"Police are searching for a man and woman".
Why did they say that?
Why didn't they say "Police are looking for the newborns mother and father".
Reading on...
Regional duty officer for the South Eastern region Inspector Jim Plowman said: “What I would like to say to the parents, that have taken the child, they’ve currently committed no criminal offenses, this is purely looking at the welfare of the baby and I would urge them to get in contact with the police as soon as possible.”

So they interrupt the whole of Queensland to send out this 'Amber Alert' of a missing newborn, when its actually the newborns parents that have taken the child, and have not committed any offense.

Now I'm assuming the parents might be junkies, and hospital staff probably weren't planning on allowing these people to take their child out of concerns for its welfare; but was this news justified when no offense has occurred?
And what about the parents themselves, have they been unfairly targeted by placing news reports about them across every news channel?

I don't know these peoples DOCS or criminal histories.
But should the government really be placing news reports all over the TV about people (including their photos) who've not actually committed any offenses?

Just my 2 cents for this morning...