Dear Bazz,

It is a controversial issue - and there's
so much on the web, so many different opinions.
This one speaks to me: -

Taken from the web:

"We are on any objective measure
a highly diverse but highly cohesive society.
Legislation has been one handmaiden of this
success. The Racial Discrimination Act came
into effect as our first national human rights
law. It has provided every Australian with the
assurance that they should be treated fairly,
regardless of their colour or background.
To me at least, this act remains as
important as ever, especially for those most
vulnerable to experiencing discrimination."

Foxy do you really think those QUT students were treated "fairly" Do you think Prior treated them "Fairly" by threatening and extorting money from them? Do you think the AHRC treated them "fairly" for dragging the whole thing out for years and then gave them a few days notice to appear?
If so I would appreciate you telling us what is fair.

I've already stated that I felt the judge in the
Prior case made the right decision. It was a weak
claim and was dismissed as it should have been.

Foxy it was an absolute disgrace from that whiny little blackmailing snowflake Prior, through the AHRC and the courts. It was a disgusting racist oppression of a bunch of blokes who had done nothing to warrant it.
It was not fair and this act has to be repealed and people have to be told if "It" offends you then too bad.
Personally I am offended by all of this nonsense but but being white, male and old totally disqualifies me from any support from these dicks!

Dear JB.,

I understand your anger regarding this particular
case. The judge made the right decision.

Foxy I wish you a very happy Christmas and a prosperous New Year and will not prolong this argument but the judge should have noted the injustice caused by delay.
Apparently there is no stopping Cyndi who was said to have fled to Germany but now appears trying for an appeal. Determined to make a tawdry quid.