Hillary supporters attack trump Voter because this poor old man voted for TRUMP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjCWLPAK9y4

This is what this old man deserve? Is it right or wrong?

Oh the indignation of being subjected to an anonymous attack and someone mentioning Trump!

Oh dear oh dear oh dear

What shall we do about these people?
Which people you may well ask?

To be totally honest this is just a troll. The video is out of context and there is no indication that these African-Americans are Clinton supporters any more than they were Gary Johnson or Jill Stein supporters is there? Actually, there's no indication that they supported ANYONE, or even voted!

There are heaps of videos similar to these and making jokes about the perpetrators motives, when obviously their motive is to get stupid comments from their peers and the internet dregs.

Nothing more to see here, move along and go away.

you just need to check news and other publishing papers. What they says is exactly i share...

If you take it wrong just check this, its interesting dear: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/donald-trumps-thoughts-on-cyber-security/

I am sures they does shares exactly what you says, that's the 24 hour news cycle. News channels have never been wrong before though have they?

Beating people up is of course not right. I've seen video of kids beating each other up teh carpark that was worse.

Anyways, what should we cares whats some 'Merkins does.

Makes me wonder what the other group were planning if they lost the election, we knows dey got guns eh.

Hmpf, bloody septics.

Bugsy do you support violent public attacks on innocent citizens? Yes / No ?
Do you think voters have a right to freely attack others if their candidate doesn't win? Yes / No ?
Did you support Hillary? Yes / No ?

It's not important who the attackers supported.
What is important is that they attacked him because he supported a candidate they opposed.

This infowars article states the incident happened in Chicago.
http://www.infowars.com/shock-video-black-mob-viciously-beats-white-trump-voter/

This breitbart article details how the protests are being organised by MoveOn an organisation funded by George Soros.
http://www.breitbart.com/live/2016-election-world-reacts-donald-trumps-stunning-upset-victory/moveon-protests-white-house/

This article discusses the MoveOn protesters are being bussed in (operations in Chicago) trying to start a coloured revolution which is the MO of George Soros.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/soros-trump-protests-revolution/
Do you know who George Soros is and what he does?
If not you need to become informed and get up to speed.
There's this amazing thing called 'the internet' (in case you weren't aware);
You should really try it out sometime, you know - so you don't look so foolish posting such completely uninformed crap...

Shocking video.

I'm still waiting to see if someone starts a discussion on the apparent spike in racial abuse, and the graffitiing of racist slurs and swastikas on public property and on the private property of minorities. And often including or followed-up with a, "Go Trump!"

http://twitter.com/i/moments/796417517157830656

Fat chance of that happening on OLO, eh?

Poor Melania, though. No one’s spared a thought for her yet. All she wanted was a sugar daddy and now she’s First Lady! She’ll be off as soon as Trump's presidency is over, though. Especially after he bragged about committing sexual assault, which I guess has somewhat been condoned now that Trump’s been elected. That's at least a bit of a load off of the consciences of those who have committed it before, I suppose.

Armchair Critic,

If you want to retain the slightest ounce of credibility, then I wouldn’t be linking to looney conspiracy sites like Inforwars if I were you. Especially not with someone as unhinged as Alex Jones…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FutIJ24jCnE

//Do you know who George Soros is and what he does?//

He is a Reptilian, as clearly shown in this photo:

http://static.businessinsider.com/image/527d01b7ecad045f2e0cd408/image.jpg

Just like the internet, the camera never lies.

And he drinks blood, because even wikipedia said that's what Reptilians do so it must be true.

I haven't seen the video, and do not need to to see it to know that the
Left is made up of vicious, anti-democtatic brutes who always react with violence and immaturity when they don't get their way.

Hey AJ Philips,
I could if you want me too, should I start with the Muslim who claimed being attacked by Trump supporters yesterday and then admitted she faked the story?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3923920/Man-Trump-hat-viciously-attacks-female-student-hijab.html

Would it be wrong of me to suggest that since the protests are being supported and paid for by Soros MoveOn that many of the things you're claiming Trump supporters have done are actually done by Trump opposers looking to stir up civil unrest?

Who's doing the vandalism?
This is no different to Soros Black Lives Matter protests
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/11/riot-declared-in-oregon-as-anti-trump-demonstrators-damage-cars-buildings.html

If Soros and the left want to double-down and incite violence on the streets then I'll oppose it.

If you feel that attacking me gains you credibility go for it.
At this stage of the game Jones and other independent media have been vindicated more times than the crap the corporate media feeds the masses.
Maybe you and others just haven't woken up to that fact yet; no offense.

Hey Toni,
Thanks for providing the morning humour..
Saying 'The camera never lies' reminds me of a website I heard about and checked out yesterday.
I spent 15-20 mins enthralled in this one image, exploring it by zooming in and out on certain details.
Check it out, you won't be disappointed.
http://www.gigapan.com/galleries/11203/gigapans/152220

The attacker of the old man was a massive young black woman, and the vicious attack took place at a hate-filled demonstration against the Trump election by young, anti-democratic American hysterics. "Kill Trump" posters are going up all over the country. There is now no doubt that the Socialist Left, like their forebears the National Socialists (Nazis) are irredeemable scumbags and thugs.

Armchair Critic,

So you found one instance of an untrue claim and some non-specific vandalism from people who probably just wanted to take advantage of all the commotion. Big deal.

I don’t know much about this George Soros guy, but from what little I’ve read, and given how much he gets up the noses of conservatives, he seems like a pretty cool guy. Other than the fact that he’s a Reptillian, of course. That’s not good.

I’d still shake his hand, though.

You probably have all sorts of horrible conspiracy theories about what he’s apparently done or funded. But I’d be willing to bet that they’d have about as much truth to them as the conspiracies surrounding the Rothschilds.

--

ttbn,

The Nazis were a Far-Right party whose policies consisted of virtually no elements resembling socialism. Nice attempt at the Association fallacy though. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy)

The “Socialist” in “National Socialist” was misnomer like the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea”, and was left there from their early days because socialism was popular at the time. After the Nazis gained power, they abandoned the socialist elements of their policies. They banned trade unions and imprisoned socialists and communists.

Have you ever read Mein Kampf? I have, and in it Hitler couldn't shut up about how much he hated socialism and why. He saw trade-unionists as having a cult-like mentality and attributed his oration skills to the frequent debates he would have with Marxists.

Learn a bit of history.

Oh, I should also mention that Hitler favoured individualism over collectivism, segregation over racial tolerance, merit over equality, competition over co-operation, militarism over pacifism, capitalism over Marxism, realism over idealism, common sense over theory, and pragmatism over principles.

Not much of a Lefty.

Lolz, AC accuses me of posting uninformed crap.

Pot. Kettle.

I don't support civil violence in any way. The fact they mentioned Trump has no bearing on the video or on their actions, and doesn't reflect on the actions of anyone else, whether they happen to be black, Clinton supporter or otherwise share similar political views.

They are just opportunists, taking advantage of a heated situation to excuse their thuggery. That's how the LA riots started, and many situations.

Using this video to support outrage at people with opposing political views is just BS.

And you lot are no different, wanting ramp up the political rhetoric to further your own agenda.

I'm out, you can circle jerk this as much as you want.

AJ Philips,

You are the most ignorant windbag infesting OLO. Hitler was a man of the anti-democratic Left. A person much like you, with more conviction. The National Socialists party was based on the German Workers Party. A yes, I have read Hitler's ravings - and clearly I understood them better than you, you dimwit.

Bugsy,

You are another dimwitted windbag. AC is correct. He also wastes his time trying to discuss anything with extreme, anti-democratic Leftist liars like you. Unlike you, AC can actually read and absorb things. He doesn't just allow himself to led by the nose. He doesn't agree with me all the time, neither do I with him; but I respect him as a non-idealogue who thinks for himself and works things out for himself. You and your and mate AJ Philips are the antithesis of democracy and fair-mindedness - vicious little tin pot Hitlers who think that you are bright enough to put other people down if their opinions displease you. You are definitely not bright enough or tough enough.

AJ Philips,
Umm.... So let me ask you this...
You support George Soros (by your admission) so you by extension support Open Society Foundation, MoveOn, Black Lives Matters and other activist groups who organise and send people out onto the streets to deliberately attack, vandalise, assault people and cause civil unrest?
Is that what you're clearly saying you support, am I correct?

Do you know what the definition of terrorism is?
'the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.'
Google - Look it up - http://www.google.com.au/#q=define+terrorism

Bugsy,
It wasn't anything personal but on this occasion you did initially post some absolute rubbish.
Your first reply was to write off chrisjohnsonmaras thread as "...just a troll" and concluded with "Nothing more to see here, move along and go away."

Your first response to this thread seemed to condone terrorism...

"Using this video to support outrage at people with opposing political views is just BS."

Well that's a fair statement, maybe chrisjohnsonmar should have written a less biased opening statement discussing attacks from both sides?
But even that discussion couldn't be had without outlining the riots that have ensued in numerous cities by anti-Trumpers in response to Trumps electoral win.
A better discussion might have contrasted that first argument by reflecting on what Trump supporters might have done had Trump lost.

In any case I didn't start the thread and I'm just informing of what's actually going on the keep the argument balanced.
- And making a point that organising protesters to deliberately assault innocent people is wrong.
(Just like Wikileaks PROVED that Hillary and other Democrats were complicit in doing at Trump rallies.)

Fair enough AC.

ttbn, I am longer responding to your vicious name-calling and abuse.

I can no longer stand to see someone so proud of their own ignorance. There's no use engaging in any kind of dialogue, but don't pretend that you are taking the high road here.

There were similar street riots and attacks after Obama was elected.
It's a national sport over there.

ttbn,

If The Nazi Party was based on the German Workers Party, why was one of their first actions to ban Trade Unions?
It was because he feared the masses and didn't want them organised.

By the way, Hitler wasn't a vegetarian and was a devout Catholic who painted religious portraits and got inspiration from the Bible.
You may read things but perhaps you don't understand them.

ttbn,

What an unpleasant person you are.

<<You are the most ignorant windbag infesting OLO.>>

Just because you don't like, and can never counter, anything I say, that doesn't make me ignorant or a windbag.

<<Hitler was a man of the anti-democratic Left.>>

Anti-democratic? Yes. A man of the Left? No, and I've already demonstrated that.

Anti-democratic sentiment is not a uniquely Left phenomenon. Every ideology becomes anti-democratic the more extreme it gets.

<<A person much like you, with more conviction.>>

Another insult. I must have really hit a nerve. But don't worry, the fact that you are on the same side of the political spectrum as the Nazis says nothing about who you are as a person. At least not as much as your abusive behaviour does.

<<The National Socialists party was based on the German Workers Party.>>

Yes, and soon as they gained power they ditched any pro-worker philosophy. Do you honestly believe that it's normal behaviour for workers to ban trade unions?

<<A yes, I have read Hitler's ravings …>>

I don't believe you. No one who has read Mein Kampf could possibly mistake it as Leftwing. It’s the Rightwing equivalent of the Communist Manifesto.

<<... and clearly I understood them better than you, you dimwit.>>

How so? Go on then. Tell me what it was that I didn't understand instead of just name-calling.

--

Armchair Critic,

I don't know much about those organisations, but I'm not going to judge them based on what hooligans do.

As for terrorism, technically union protests fit the definition too, according to legislation. Which is why statutes have provisions to specifically exclude behaviour that we wouldn't normally consider actual terrorism. And yes, even violent protests.

Rache,

You are another dimwitted ignoramus. Hitler was no more a Catholic than I am, and trade unions have nothing to do with right, left or middle. I said nothing about his diet either you fool.

Bugsy,

Good.

AJ,

There is a limit to what I will take from a grub like you. Of course you think I'm unpleasant. If I said what I really think of you I would be banned. You are not worth that. I'll just settle for 'insufferable bore' and 'ignorant know all'. I pity your family. You must be hell to live with.

the Democrats are providing therapy dogs to be patted by those who are so depressed. Try it Steelie. How have the lefties produced such weak brainwashed ravel.

ttbn,

I'm starting to think you don't know what “dimwitted” means.

<<You are another dimwitted ignoramus.>>

Apparently, to you, it simply means, ‘someone who is not politically aligned with you’.

Even I can acknowledge that there are intelligent and educated people with whom I often disagree without implying that they're stupid just because we disagree.

<<Hitler was no more a Catholic than I am ...>>

That's debatable. But I'm happy to say that he wasn't, because it doesn't really matter.

<<... and trade unions have nothing to do with right, left or middle.>>

Actually, they do. They are fiercely Leftwing.

<<I said nothing about his diet either you fool.>>

You may not have, you fool, but the rumour that Hitler was a vegetarian is just one of the ways in which the Right try to tie Naziism to the Left with their re-writing of history.

<<There is a limit to what I will take from a grub like you.>>

More name-calling from an ignoramus who apparently has nothing.

<<Of course you think I'm unpleasant.>>

Anyone would, given your abuse. My opinion there is not subjective.

<<I pity your family. You must be hell to live with.>>

My wife and children love me and we are all very happy. Thanks for your concern either way. I have no idea why you would bring my family into it though. You must really be desperate.

Somehow I don't think it's me who would be hell to live with.

I never thought it was possible, but I now have more respect for runner than I do for you. He may be a hateful person, but at least he tries to present a rational argument on the odd occasion and never brings someone's family into it.

Children,

Before we descend into a yet another interminable slanging match, could I recommend that, in each of your posts, you make at least one token reference to the topic of the thread.

I don't mind the "You're a dim-witted ignoramus", "No, you're a dim-witted ignoramus", "Well, you're a fool", "No, you're a fool", "Well my daddy's a policeman and he'll put you in jail", "Well, my daddy's a .... "

Etc. Etc. Etc.

But I do get irritated having to delete such pointless posts and I'm having enough trouble with my bastard computer as it is.

Just trying to help.

Joe

Philips,

Rave on as much as you like. Nothing will ever redeem you, you ridiculous, pompous twit. Unions are "fiercly" Left are they? That explains why I was always a union member at work, and a union rep for a while then, does it? You need to mix with people, pal; get out of your bubble and stop categorising people according to rigid one-sided reading of your Marxist heroes. If you want to be as petty as the silly 'rache' person, Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian towards the end. He was a hypochondriac, who was constantly fiddling with 'cures' and the occult. He was never a Catholic. The only religion he admired was Islam, with which he thought he could work very well. He did, in fact, enjoy the cooperation of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the matter of solving the Jewish question. Hitler was a very sick and twisted man, but he is still talked about, unlike oiks like you who will remain nobodies. They say that a little knowledge is dangerous, but yours is so infitesimal that you are only a danger to yourself. Goodbye, little man.

Hey AJ Philips,
"I don't know much about those organisations, but I'm not going to judge them based on what hooligans do."

This is the PRECISE ISSUE I'm trying to shine light upon in my comments on this thread..

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2016/03/10/billionaire-smackdown-george-soros-funds-effort-to-stop-trump-mobilize-latinos/

Quote>>Financier George Soros is launching, along with other donors, a $15 million campaign to achieve the largest Latino and immigrant participation at the polls, the New York Times reported.

Through a new super PAC named Immigrant Voters Win, the campaign is funding organizations in states such as Florida, Nevada and Colorado, which have large or growing Latino and Asian communities, in the hope of influencing turnout in November, the Times reported.<<

This guys promotes and funds open borders initiatives, and empowers minority groups to come out on the streets and cause civil unrest.
As well as working to affect government legislation etc such as creating the 'Sanctuary Cities' of which every one of them which went blue (democrats) on election day.

These same people rioting were probably part of the #NeverTrump movement; or other paid activist groups where ads were put out on Craigslist, and which has been happening the entire election campaign.

http://www.infowars.com/chicago-producer-posts-craigslist-ad-soliciting-troublemakers-to-slam-donald-trump/
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/11/looks-like-george-soros-funding-trump-protests-just-like-funded-ferguson-riots.html

How would you feel if we had a land border with Mexico and some billionaire was funding "Open Borders" and "Immigrant Voters Win" etc.

It's not so much that I'm intolerant (though I'll openly admit I don't care much for multiculturalism), rather that I clearly recognise that our western nations are under attack by people seeking to deliberately use immigration as a tool to displace the traditional populations; as well as other globalist agendas in an effort to push us towards global government.

Another thing about you AJ Philips is that you are a preacher. Not content with expressing your opinion, you have to harangue people with opinions you do not like. Like all extremists, what you do not think should not be allowed; so you harp and carp, on and on, like a fire and brimstone evangelist, boring people silly and not achieving anything. Come to think of it, I don't recall you ever expressing an opinion; you merely criticise others for what they say. Many people on OLO disagree with what I think, and good luck to them. With a few lapses, I leave them alone, and they leave me alone. On the whole, I find most posters decent people with whom I could have a face to face chat with. But you, no. The only other person like you on OLO was a character calling himself AJ Morgan. The initials could be a coincidence, but I would't be at all surprised to find that you were the same person. There coulld not be two like you.

AC,

You are certainly not intolerant. I think you have the patience of Job dealing with AJ Philips-Morgan. Mind you, the practitioners of philosophy don't find tolerance a virtue, rather describing it as a wishy-washy sentiment that lacks values. Nobody would call me tolerant: accepting is the closest I can manage. We are all different: something that AJP-M will never be able to accept.

And who were you in a past life ttbn? Did you have your previous account deleted?

There was never a AJ Morgan, bit there was a CJ Morgan. I believe he died a number years ago and his last post was about 6 years ago.

I can understand that you tend to conflate things like that though, it happens a lot with dementia.

Bugsy,

Thought you weren't having anything to do with me. However, I have to admit that you could be right about CJ Morgan now that I see it in print. Six years ago would be about right. He was a truly awful human being in my opinion, and I am very happy to have outlived him. I am sometimes wrong, and in this case it appears that my belief that there couldn't be two people like CJ Morgan was wrong. Significantly, both these people were favoured by the thankfully departed cranky Left women who had been around for a long time.

ttbn,

Once again, with nowhere left to turn, you resort to ad hominem attacks, with a couple of irrelevant facts thrown in for good measure. You’re in fine form. You even had to come back a second time for another go. I must have really gotten under your skin.

So.

Much.

Anger.

Facts hurt, don’t they?

--

Bugsy,

I’ve often wondered this, too, ever since ttbn first mentioned CJ Morgan.

<<And who were you in a past life ttbn? Did you have your previous account deleted?>>

I can’t for the life of me think of who he could have been though. Although having had his previous account deleted would explain why ‘ttbn’ (ironically) stands for ‘try to be nice’. A little self-reminder perhaps?

Actually, ttbn, you probably do have a point with regards to trade unions and the political spectrum, nowadays. I can think of a couple of staunch unionists who I know that are also racist bogans.

However, in Hitler’s time, most were Marxists. Hitler spoke a bit in Mein Kampf about refusing to the join the unions and being ostracised because of that. He’d eat lunch by himself and the only non-professional contact he had with his colleagues was when he’d argue against Marxism in debates with them.

I never had an account cancelled; I gave it a way because of the morons. Thankfully they are gone. The relatively new AJ Philips is, of course, here making a fool of himself, but there is a need for a village idiot, I suppose, if only to remind us how well the rest of us are.

back to the topic. A number of the Clinton supporters are certainly showing themselves to be the 'deplorables'. What irony!

ttbn,

I wouldn't regard someone who had clocked up nine years of participation on a forum that is seventeen years old "relatively new". If anything, it's sad.

Must be that dementia again.

I'm glad you think I make an idiot out of myself. Coming from someone who is as consistently wrong as you are, that would suggest that I'm usually in the right. Your heavy reliance on ad hominem attacks is a testament to that.

I'm fascinated now as to who you used to be, though. There have been a few on this forum who were as bitter and angry as you. My best guess is that you used to be 'Individual'. He used to post short and sharp one paragraph posts that contained little thought too.

certainly the most bitter and violent today are the Clinton supporters. Never having been spanked in their life they are now seeing it their right to beat up Trump voters. What a pathetic class of people our socialist have produced. They are pitiful.

Runner,

It's the anti-democratic Left in general that is bitter. Today, The Guardian is really spitting and cursing.

Ttbn, You is a pathetic leftist! The Nazi's were proudly rightwing and so am I. You find left wing Nazi organization and I will eat my hat! You speak offensive talk to nationalists and those who appreciate their culture and heritage! Even Marist AJ Phillips understands that.

That meant "Marxist" Aj.

Diedrich,

You're a pathetic leftist, with your impliccit support for the namby-pamby Nazis and their silly Vallhala. They co-operated with Stalen's generals, so of course they were extreme-Left. Georing even used to give out bread on holidays to the 'poor', i.e. the loafers, and if that's not socailism, I don't know what is. What a bunch of pancies

Diedrich,

You no a speak a da English too good!

Marxist, Marxist, Marxist. Get a new line, guys.

So now we have the fact that the opportunistic Nazis co-operated with Stalin’s guys (whom they eventually turned on) as evidence that they were a bunch of Lefties. Sheesh, we’re really scraping the barrel here.

The neo-Nazi does make a good point, though. All modern neo-Nazi groups are far-Right groups. You don’t see too many neo-Nazis tying themselves to trees in protests. We even had a Nazi sympathiser on OLO years ago who was a Right-winger and a good Christian man. (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/user.asp?id=23391) He seemed to be embraced warmly by OLO’s conservatives. Obviously poor old Dietrich has gotten off on the wrong foot here.

Loudmouth, the nazis was not namby pamby! Feel good democracy is namby pamby sham and can not deal with Islam. The nazis would deal with Islam swiftly. Instead they open flood gates and destroy white cultures. Trump will be stopped banning Muslims you will see.

Blind Freddy can see that in spite of what the media likes to portray, the violence emanating from the so "tolerant" left whingers in the US vastly overshadows anything from the conservatives.

Wel, yeah SM. The conservatives 'won'.

Der.

"The nazis would deal with Islam swiftly."

Germany bans Islamic organization, police raid 190 sites

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/15/germany-bans-islamic-organization-police-search-190-sites.html

AJ Philips, Here's an old 60 minutes interview with George Soros
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Ux5b6YM9A

Deitrich,

Yeah, well, the nazie left-Whingers went back on their racial purity and separatist ideas by sucking up to the Islamists, like the Grand Mouphti, they even allowed Bosnians and Albanians into their execution squads.

They would have welcomed ISIDS as long as they were attacking the right targets, like the Jewish Pope or that Kenyan, or of coarse Jews. They certainly would have gone soft on them, using them to undermine all the corrupt values of western uerope and the US, like democracy and equality, but probably would have declared them to be Aryans and inter-married with them. They forgot that groups must be alsways kept strictly apaert as much as possibler. Cultures are races, different for all time, never learning anything from each other.

AJ,

Who says satire is a lost art ?

Joe

Loudmouth, the nazis only pretend to admire the Arab world for historical achievements. Anyone who believe they would let Germanic culture be destroyed from other races is idiot. They would squash anything that was threat to Germany like bugs!

The Nazis had common goal with Arab word of removing Judaism. That is it. Who is your aliance with Leftist? Failed democracy! You still have to live with Jews and Muslims!

Sorry Dietrich, I didn't know bugs were a threat to Germany.

When you write "The Nazis had common goal with Arab word of removing Judaism", do you mean that the Arab world wants to remove Judaism, to exterminate Jews, to obliterate Israel ? That such propaganda from 'the Arab world' is in line with Nazi propaganda ? That if they had the chance, the 'Arab world' would exterminate, just like the Nazis ?

So movements like the BDS campaign are pro-Nazi and fascist because its proponents implicitly support that sort of talk from Palestinian fascists - that wanting to sweep all Israelis into the sea is the sort of thing the Nazis would have done, and now the 'Left' supports ? Now that the 'Arab world' wants to do the same ? So has the 'Arab world' gone 'left', or has the 'left' gone fascist ? Or have both always had fascist tendencies ?

Just trying to clarify, on behalf of all my 'leftist' friends ......

Joe

Anyway, for what it's worth, this Canadian news item following the declarations by many media people that they would leave the US if Trump won:

“…..Canadian border residents say it’s not uncommon to see dozens of sociology professors, liberal arts majors, global-warming activists, and green energy proponents crossing their fields at night. ‘I went out to milk the cows the other day, and there was a Hollywood producer huddled in the barn,’ said southern Manitoba farmer Red Greenfield, whose acreage borders North Dakota. ‘He was cold, exhausted and hungry, and begged me for a no-fat chai latte and some free-range organic chicken. When I said I didn’t have any, he left….’

“In an effort to stop the illegal aliens, Greenfield erected higher fences, but the liberals scaled them. He then installed loudspeakers that blared Rush Limbaugh across the fields, but they just stuck their fingers in their ears and kept coming.

"Officials are particularly concerned about smugglers who meet liberals just south of the border, pack them into electric cars, and drive them across the border, where they are simply left to fend for themselves after the battery dies. ‘A lot of these people are not prepared for our rugged conditions,’ a Mountie in Alberta said. ‘I found one carload without a single bottle of Perrier water, or any gemelli with shrimp and arugula. All they had was a nice little Napa Valley cabernet and some kale chips’.

"When illegal liberals are caught, they’re sent back across the border, often wailing that they fear persecution from Trump high-hairers.”

Probably a spoof - who is going to believe that the Napa valley can produce a cabernet to come anywhere near ours - although .....