Suseonline, "I think those feminist top police officers were just adding their obviously common views.."

You admit they were being political.

Would they, their masters and you accept the ordinary officer using his position and the Victoria police letterhead to promote his/her political views? Or much more likely, would the ordinary constable be carpeted, smacked around the ears with the Police Manual and the Professional and Ethical Standards therein and given a punishment transfer with a black mark forever, or spat out of the system for it?

Suseonline, "the pathetic behaviour of a man that many men and boys look up to"

What manure.

Eddie and sports commentators are there as explained previously to add colour and entertain. The role as developed by the media directors was to be controversial, to sensationalise and to act the idiot.

It is the sort of low-brow entertainment that an educated, middle class, self-entitled white fembot would splutter about and scoff at over her monkey excreted coffee among people of her choosing, Double Bay. Far away from the fish'n'chip shop frequented by the football loving lower classes.

Eddie and ors, women jocks too, are stereotypes created and managed by producers. Contrary to the bovine behaviour expected of the despised working class by the superior-acting feminists, workers are very practical even where they are letting their hair down and can easily discriminate between fantasy and reality. Between the over-the-top show-biz act for a quid of Eddie and women Jocks too, and what is real life.

What the educated, middle class white feminist elite have done again is to deliberately and wilfully misinterpret and misconstrue the low brow language, images, humour and satire of the working class as real threats. That is unprincipled and ludicrous.

Now the fembots are rushing to have it all filed away for next time, 'Suck it up and move on'.

The hem of Oz feminism has been lifted and it is not a pretty sight.

One question Onthebeach.
Why on earth would you think feminists only exist among white, well educated, upper class women, and not among women from other ethnic groups, or the often equally well educated working class women? Is it because you are frightened of upperclass women?

And I have no doubt there are plenty of myn who just love Big Ed and the other TV footy boys, who are from all groups in our society. Men like other manly men after all.
What a load of excrement you exude at times...

Every time we have this kind of outrage it really only serves to show how far women have to go in order to be liberated.

A couple of men attacked a woman journalist. Why they did it is not really relevant. It was never a joke and always meant to hurt. It was not an attack on ‘women’ it was an attack on one woman who was perceived to have opinions which the men did not like. The men used words because they know that words can hurt.

The same weapon which they used is also available to the women journalist. She could have fought back and ridiculed the men in the same way in which they ridiculed her. It would have been a fair fight. She didn’t fight back. Instead she played the victim and stood by while others were not attacked whipped up a storm of public outrage. It was no longer a fair fight but a few men against a seething mob.

Women who act like Wilson are weak individuals and cowards. They have exactly the same power as men but want to make out that they are helpless victims. They try and engender sympathy rather than take their issue to the men themselves. They want to look powerless because they are too cowardly to fight back. Every other woman who joins in the lynch mob just confirms how weak and powerless they think women are. They believe that women are too weak to fight back unless as a part of some kind of lynch mob.

Women are not powerless. Individual women can stand up to individual men or even to a couple of men. How much longer are they going to keep up this charade of being defenceless and desperate for help? Fight back but fight fair and stop hiding behind your gender.

Phanto,

It's interesting that you advocate the woman journalist to sledge back at the chappies who sledged her.

You perhaps should take into account the fact that she's a grown woman - and therefore mature of thought and action.

Why you would think she'd entertain the thought of squabbling with these puerile buffoons is beyond me.

She does not have to 'sledge' back at them. The pen is mightier than the sword and if she really wanted to respond I'm sure she good do so in such a way that they would think twice about doing it again.

She should do something - either put up or shut up. Everyone else should also shut up since it does not concern them. They jump on a bandwagon instead of confronting their own issues with the men in their own life.

phanto,

So your suggestion is that she play kiddie games with the wee man boys?

Lol!...