Susie thinks she has all the answers because humans have learned to murder the unborn in the womb, and by chemically removing fertility. All of which interferes with normal human functions and has health complications. She believes the answer to life is being able to kill the aged by poison.

As far as transgender: CNS News reports, Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University and former psychiatrist–in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital, who has studied transgendered people for 40 years, said it is a scientific fact that “transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women become men.
All such people, he explained in an article for The Witherspoon Institute, “become feminized men or masculinized women, counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they ‘identify.’”
Dr. McHugh, who was psychiatrist-in-chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital for 26 years, the medical institute that had initially pioneered sex-change surgery – and later ceased the practice – stressed that the cultural meme, or idea that “one’s sex is fluid and a matter of choice” is extremely damaging, especially to young people

Yes susie has the answers to normality!

AJ
You hit my optic nerve and you do have a nerve saying God is the ultimate cause of all the world's problems . You say any action is limited to a warning , by your choice, then blame God because you limit him . Do you have kids who think in that style - what age would that be?

Why is that, nicknamenick?

<<...you do have a nerve saying God is the ultimate cause of all the world's problems .>>

Because, if it’s just because I’ve said something about your god that offends you, then that’s not a good enough reason to claim that I have a nerve demonstrating that your god would be the ultimate cause of all the world’s problems.

I’ve believe I’ve provided sufficient reason to support my claim.

<<You say any action is limited to a warning , by your choice, then blame God because you limit him .>>

This sentence doesn’t actually make any sense.

What actions are limited to a warning? I have not placed any limits on your god, or blamed him for anything because of those limits. It is precisely because I place no limits on him that I say he would be ultimately responsible for all the bad in the world had he actually existed.

<<Do you have kids who think in that style - what age would that be?>>

In what style? I don’t even know what style of thinking I’m dealing with now, let alone the style of thinking you’re trying to describe.

I'm starting to think it might be best if I just smile while slowly stepping backwards.

AJ
"But yes, if he could provide me with good reasoning, then I would have no problem with him at least warning me in advance."
You repeated "warning me".
Then you say God is wrong for letting bad things happen.
You want it both ways.

Yes, nicknamenick, I repeated that.

<<You repeated "warning me".>>

If he could warn people of the bad consequences that would result from some of the actions they may be contemplating, then that would be nice. That’s not taking someone’s free will away from them.

He could also intervene when bad things happen. That’s another option.

<<Then you say God is wrong for letting bad things happen.>>

Absolutely. He’s evil.

He has the time to help believers find their car keys and win football matches, but apparently he can’t spare a moment to feed millions of starving children. What kind of a disgusting god is that? He needs to re-assess his priorities.

<<You want it both ways.>>

Want what both ways? I see no contradiction in the above.

You're still not making much sense.

AJ Philips, believes believes the reality of the world is evil, We are all doomed! That is the problem with atheists they see no purpose or hope in their world view. It is a pity they are so negative about life.

Life and hope are divine, fear of death and hopelessness are evil. The important thing is to believe in life and have hope in a better future, and be part of creating that future.