The Forum > General Discussion > Hero or Dill?
Hero or Dill?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You Sir should be aware that on issues which require radical
solutions that are likely to harm vested economic and
political interests, censorship exists today (as it has
existed in the past). In Australia in 2006, leading
climatologists with that country's pre-eminent public
research organisation, CSIRO, were forbidden by the
organisation's management from publicly discussing the
implications of climate change. Management was acting on behalf
of the government. And Australia is one of the standout countries
in terms if human development status. It is not corrupt.
Its science is world class. None of this matters.
In 2006, the Australian Gernment's position was to cast doubt on
global warming and refuse to enter into UN agreements such
as the Kyoto Protocol.
With the release of the Stern Report on climate change, the
Australian Government's position changed. The PM remained half-
hearted about a commitment to counter global warming.
When igrnorance and vested interests are confronted by
scientific facts - it's usually the case that vested interest
will win out.
Nothing new there.