Yes, “divorce” is for her a weapon, rather then being something that is a sensible argument. Time and again, afterwards, she makes known she never did mean what she was saying, but she admit that in her anger she would have done it.
.
Actually, my wife had her divorce with her (now late) husband and then remarried him!
.
She is one person who ignore what she destroys in time of anger, regardless that she is time and again wrong.
.
A few years ago, we were driving when I happen to comment to my wife that she was 71. My wife angrily responded that only 70 and she didn’t like it that I was making her older then she was and it showed I didn’t care about her and she was going to get a divorce. During the rest of the drive she was in no mood of listening.
The next day I wrote down on a piece of paper her date of birth and left it on the table. Soon afterwards she made known to me that she had been wrong and she was in fact 71 just that she didn’t feel it to be so.
.
People like my wife would be seeking a divorce for the wrong reason. Yet, the Commonwealth of Australia fails to allow for people like my wife proper consideration, and avoid divorces applied for in anger to proceed.
.
People who get older do loose at times a sense of responsibility and proper judgment and hence the Internet kind of divorce could have serious harm for any person who in anger could file for a divorce but never intention to proceed with it only to discover afterwards being divorced.
.
A-know-of-many-cases-where-the-family-incurred-huge-debt-and-then-the-wife-opt-out-of-the-marriage-so-that-the-husband-has-to-face-all-the-debts-while-she-can-get-a-settlement-and-be-free-of-debt. To complicated to explain it all in this post, but I for one do view that a divorce as like any other contract must not have a “no fault” provision. And, I have not even addressed the issue of children and the harm to them.
.